²Ä¤T¤Q¨÷(2001) shuYing - 2001-09-29
¥xÆWºØ½Þ°Ê±¡¯À±µ¨ü¾¹¦h²£°ò¦]ÀW²v

³¯¨Î¸© ¹ù¤¯Ä_ ±i¨qÆq

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

½Þ°¦°Ê±¡¯À±µ¨ü¾¹(Estrogen Receptor, ESR)°ò¦]®y¦ì©ó²Ä¤@¹ï¬V¦âÅéµuÁu¤W¡A¨ã¦³¨â­Ó¹ï°¸°ò¦]A©MB¡C¤åÄm³ø§i«ü¥X¡AESR°ò¦]«¬¬°BB¤§¥À½Þ¸ûAA«¬ªÌ¡A¨C­L¤À§O¥i¦h¤À®Y1.5»P1.0ÀY¥H¤W¥J½Þ»P¬¡¥J½Þ¡A¬G¥ç±NESR°ò¦]®y¤§B¹ï°¸°ò¦]ºÙ¬°¦h²£°ò¦]¡C¥»¸ÕÅçÀ³¥Î³æÂI®Ö苷»Ä¬ðÅÜÂI©îÂ÷¦¡»E¦Xþª³sÂê¤ÏÀ³(MS-PCR)§Þ³N¡A°w¹ï¥xÆW¦a°Ï¤K®a¥Á¶¡ºØ½Þ³õ»P¤­­Ó¸ÕÅç¬ã¨s³æ¦ì¤§ºØ½Þ¡A¶i¦æESR°ò¦]«¬³{¾÷ÀË´ú¡C­p§¹¦¨7657ÀYºØ½ÞÀË´ú¡A¥]¬AÂÅ·ç´µ¡B¬ù§J®L¡B§ù¬¥§J(D)¡B±ö¤s½Þ(M)¡B®ç¶é½Þ¡B½L§J®L¡BÄõÀ¬½Þ¡Bªá¦â½Þ¡B°g±m½Þ»P¯b¸Õ¶Â½Þ¤@¸¹¡A¥H¤ÎM»PD¤§Âø¥æ½Þ¡Cµ²ªGµo²{¡G°£M»PD¤§Âø¥æ½Þ¥~¡A«e­z¦U«~ºØESR°ò¦]«¬¬°BB«¬¤§ÀW²v¤À§O¬°0.3%¡B26.6%¡B0%¡B100%¡B80.0%¡B1.0%¡B16.7%¡B10.8%¡B31.0%»P1.9%¡FB¹ï°¸°ò¦]ÀW²v«h¤À§O¬°0.05¡B0.51¡B0.00¡B1.00¡B0.81¡B0.01¡B0.42¡B0.46¡B0.50»P0.16¡C

ÃöÁäµü¡G°Ê±¡¯À±µ¨ü¾¹¡B°ò¦]ÀW²v¡B½Þ°¦¡C

¡@

THE PROLIFIC GENE FREQUENCY OF ESTROGEN
RECEPTOR LOCUS FOR BREEDING PIGS IN TAIWAN

C. H. Chen, R. B. Liaw and H. L. Chang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

The estrogen receptor (ESR) locus in swine was mapped at p-arm of chromosome one with two alleles, A and B. Literature indicated that BB homozygotic sows produced 1.0 and 1.5 more piglets at birth and born alive, respectively than did AA homozygotes. And thus, B allele of ESR locus is generally recognized as prolific gene. Mutagenically separated polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR) technique was applied in the study for ESR genotyping. A total of 7657 breeding pigs from eight private breeding farms and five research stations were blood sampled for genotyping. The genotypic frequencies of BB homozygotes were 0.3%, 26.6%, 0%, 100%, 80.0%, 1.0%, 16.7%, 10.8%, 31.0% and 1.9% for Landrace, Yorkshire, Duroc, Meishan, Taoyuan, Berkshire, Lanyu, Spotty Lanyu, Mitsae and TLRI-Black, respectively. The corresponding gene frequencies for prolific gene B allele were 0.05, 0.51, 0.00, 1.00, 0.81, 0.01, 0.42, 0.46, 0.50 and 0.16, respectively.

Key Words: Estrogen receptor, Gene frequency, Swine.



½Þ°¦¦Ø°©¼Æ¤§¿ò¶Ç°Ï°ì


½Þ°¦¦Ø°©¼Æ¤§¿ò¶Ç°Ï°ì

¹ù¤¯Ä_ ±i¨qÆq ¿à¥Ã¸Î ¼BÀA±ø ÃC©À·O ¼B®¶µo §d©ú­õ

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

À³¥Î½Þ°¦·L½Ã¬P«¬¼Ð°O¥]¬A¦b²Ä¤@¸¹¬V¦âÅé¤WªºSW552¡BS0316¡BSW2130¤ÎSW780»P²Ä¤C¸¹¬V¦âÅé¤WªºSW1122¡BSW147¡BSW252¡BS0115¤ÎSW764¦@­p¤EºØ¡AÀË´ú¦Û¦×½Þ¸s¤¤¨ú±o¤§14¹ï©M17¹ï¦Ø°©¼Æªº¦Ù¦×¼Ë¥»¡Cµ²ªG¸g¥d¤è¤ÀªRÅã¥Ü¡G¦Ø°©¼Æ»P²Ä¤@¸¹¬V¦âÅéµuÁu¤WªºS0316©M²Ä¤C¸¹¬V¦âÅéªøÁu¤WªºSW1122¡BSW252¤ÎS0115¦³ÅãµÛªº¬ÛÃö¡C¥Ñ¦¹¥iª¾½Þ²Ä¤C¸¹¬V¦âÅéªøÁuªº2.4-2.5°Ï°ì¥i¯à§t¦³±±¨î¦Ø°©¼Æªº°ò¦]¡C¦Ó¥ÑÂø¥æ½ÞF1©MF2±OÅé©Êª¬ªº½Õ¬dµo²{¡A¨ã14¹ï©M17¹ï¦Ø°©¼Æªº½Þ°¦ÀW²v³Ì§C¡]¡Õ5¢H¡^¡A¨ã16¹ïªÌ«h¦û³Ì¦h¼Æ¡]55.22¢H¡^¡A¦¹¥~¡A¥ç¥iµo²{¦Ø°©¼Æ¥ª¥k°¼¤£µ¥ªº±¡§Î¡A¨äµo¥Í¤ñ²v¬°5.22¢H¡]7/134¡^¡Cºî¦Xªì¨B¸ÕÅçµ²ªG»P¥»¬ã¨sµo²{»P¦Ø°©¼Æ¬ÛÃöªº°ò¦]¥i¯à¦ì©ó²Ä¤@¸¹©M²Ä¤C¸¹¬V¦âÅé¤W¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G½Þ¡B¦Ø°©¡B·L½Ã¬P«¬¼Ð°O¡C

¡@

THE GENETIC REGIONS FOR PORCINE RIB NUMBERS

R. B. Liaw, H. L. Chang, Y. Y. Lai, C. T. Liu, N. T. Yen, C. F. Liu and M. C. Wu

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

A total of nine porcine microsatellite markers including SW552, S0316, SW2130 and SW780 on chromosome 1 and SW1122, SW147, SW252, S0115 and SW764 on chromosome 7 were used to genotype 14 and 17 rib-pair samples, which were from hog market. The result of chi-squared test between makers and number of rib pairs indicated that number of rib pairs and markers S0316 on chromosome 1 and SW1122, SW252 and S0115 on chromosome 7 were significantly related. By this, there was probably a gene for number of rib pairs on porcine chromosome 7q 2.4-2.5. In the investigation of carcass traits of hybrids F1 and F2, the frequencies of the pigs with 14 and 17 rib pairs were the least(¡Õ5¢H), but those with 16 rib pairs were the majority (55.22%). Besides, the asymmetry of left and right rib pairs was found in the study, and the frequency was 5.22% (7/134). In conclusion, the genes for number of rib pairs probably located on porcine chromosome 1 and 7 from preliminary result and this study.

Key Words: Swine, Rib, Microsatellite marker.



¤û¥ý¤Ñ©Ê¤Uµg­P¦º°ò¦]»P³æÃЯg°ò¦]¦P®ÉÀË´úªº¤èªk


¤û¥ý¤Ñ©Ê¤Uµg­P¦º°ò¦]»P³æÃЯg°ò¦]¦P®ÉÀË´úªº¤èªk

ªL¼w¨| ¶À౹Š³¯­Yµ× ±i¨qÆq

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

«Ø¥ß¦hºØ°ò¦]¦P®ÉÀË´úªº¤èªk¤£¶È¥i¸`¬ÙÀË´ú®É¶¡»P¤H¤O¡A¥ç¥i­°§CÀË´ú¦¨¥»¡C¥»¸ÕÅç¹Á¸Õ§Q¥ÎMutiplex PCR°w¹ï¤û²O¤Ú²yÂH¤O¯Ê¥¢¯g(Bovine Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency¡A´¿Ä¶¬°¤û¿ò¶Ç©Ê¥Õ¦å¯g¡ABLAD)»P¤û³æÃЯg(Deficiency of Uridine Monophosphate Synthase¡Aª½Ä¶¬°§¿®ÖúF³æÁC»ÄÆQ¦X¦¨ú@¯Ê¥¢¯g¡A°ê»Ú¤W²ºÙ¬° DUMPS)¨â­Ó­«­nªº¿ò¶Ç¯e¯f¶}µo¦P®ÉÀË´úªº¤èªk¡C¥H¤wª¾ÀË´ú¤û²O¤Ú²yÂH¤O¯Ê¥¢¯g¤Þ¤l»P¤û³æÃЯgªº¤Þ¤l¦P®É¶i¦æPCR¼W´T¤£¦P¯S©wDNA¤ù¬q¡A¦A¦P®É¥H­­¨îú@TaqI»PAvaI¨Ì§Ç¥H37¢J 3¤p®É»P65¢J 4 ¤p®É¶i¦æ¤À¤Á¡A¤À¤Á«á²£ª«¥H4% Agarose¹qªa¤ÀªR¡C¥Ñ©ó©Ò±oªºDNA¤ù¬qªø«×¦³©úÅ㪺®t²§¡A©Ò¥H©ö©ó§PŪ¤£¦Pªº¿ò¶Ç«¬¡AÅã¥Ü¥»¤èªk½T¹ê¥i¦P®ÉÀË´ú¦¹¨âºØ¿ò¶Ç¯e¯f¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¦h¼Ëªº»E¦Xú@³sÂê¤ÏÀ³¡B¤û²O¤Ú²yÂH¤O¯Ê¥¢¯g¡B³æÃЯg¡C

¡@

SIMULTANEOUS ANALYSIS OF BOVINE BLAD AND DUMPS ALLELES BY
MULTIPLEX PCR FOLLOWED BY DIGESTION WITH TWO RESTRICTION ENZYMES

D. Y. Lin, Y. C. Huang, Z. C. Chen and H. L. Chang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

An improved and simplified method allowing simultaneous genetic typing of Bovine Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency(BLAD) and Deficiency of Uridine Monophosphate Synthase(DUMPS) loci has been developed. The method is based on simultaneously amplified the fragments of two genetic disease alleles by multiplex PCR, and concurrently digested the products by two restriction enzymes(TaqI and AvaI mixed together; 37¢J 3hr and then 65¢J 4hr) in the same buffer. All combinations of the known normal and mutant alleles could be detected by electrophoretic separtion performed on the same agarous gel owing to the obvious differences in the length of the restriction fragments. The expected benefits of increased speed and decreased labour and cost seem to be worthwhile to use this improved method.

Key Words: Multiplex PCR, BLAD, DUMPS.



¨tÃЯx°}»P¼Æ­È¼ÒÀÀ¨ó§U¨Å¥Î¤½¤û¿ò¶Ç¸ê·½«O¦s


¨tÃЯx°}»P¼Æ­È¼ÒÀÀ¨ó§U¨Å¥Î¤½¤û¿ò¶Ç¸ê·½«O¦s

¶À౹Š§õ¥@©÷ ªL¼w¨| ¹ù¤¯Ä_ ³¯¨Î¸© ±i¨qÆq ¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò §Q¥Î¯x°}¦¡¨tÃйϮi¥Ü¨Å¥Î¤½¤û¤l¥N¡B®]¥N¤Î´¿®]¥Nªº§N­áºë²G«O¦sÀY¼Æ(k x 16¡Ak­Ó¦s¦³¿ò¶Çª«½èªº«á¸Ç¡A§t¥»¨­¦@15­Ó¯ª¥ý)¡A¨ÃÂǧU''¤½¥¿''»ÉªOªº¼ÒÀÀ¤Î¤½¤ûªº©Ê¬V¦âÅéY¥u¯à¥Ñ¤÷¤è¦Ó¨Óªº­­¨î¡A±q«O¦³ªº¯S©w­«­n¤½¤ûªº''¬V¦âÅé¼Æ''¦ô­p«O¦³¿ò¶Çª«½è¦Ê¤À²v¤Î¼Ð·Ç°¾®t¡C­Y«ù¦³2ÀY¤l¥Nºë²G¥i«O¦³74.1¡Ó4.5%¬V¦âÅé¡A­Y«O¦³8ÀY¤l¥N«h¥i«O¦³98.0¡Ó0.8%¡A¦ý¬O«O¦³·½¦Û¬Û¦P¤l¥Nªº®]¥N¡A¨ÃµLªk¼W¥[«O¦sªº¿ò¶Çª«½è(·½¦Û¦P¤lªº4ÀY®]¥N¡A¶È¥i«O¦³47.0¡Ó2.2%)¡A»Ý­n´£°ª·½¦Û¤£¦P¤l¥Nªº®]¥N¤~¯à¦³®Ä²vªº´£°ª«O¦sªº¿ò¶Çª«½è¡C¥H²{¦³«O¦sªº68ÀY·½¦Û¦h°êªº¤½¤û§N­áºë²G¡A´N2001¦~¬ü°ê°^Äm³Ì¤jªº20ÀY¤½¤û¿ò¶Ç¸ê·½«O¦s¶i¦æ¼ÒÀÀ¤ÀªR¡Aµo²{¼Ð¥ÜÃC¦âªº¨tÃЯx°}»P«O¦s¯S©w¿ò¶Ç¸ê·½ªº¦ôºâ¡A¥i§@¬°«OºØ¬ã¨sªº¨ó§U¤u¨ã¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¯x°}¦¡¨tÃйϡB¼ÒÀÀ¡B¿ò¶Ç¸ê·½¡C

A MATRIX PEDIGREE ALONG WITH CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION SIMULATION FOR GENETIC RESOURCE CONSERVATION OF DAIRY CATTLE Y. C. Huang, S. C. Lee, D. Y. Lin, R. B. Liaw, C. H. Cheng and H. L. Chang Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture A color edited pedigree matrix (k x 15, k offsprings with semen tanked and his 15 ancestors, including animal self) displays three generation genetic information for evaluation the desired genetic resources conserved. Mean and standard deviation of percentage of gene deposited from a particular sire was asymptotic estimated by sex-constrained chromosome segregation simulations through a serial of Bernoulli trails. Collection of semen from two and eight different sons can gather 74.1¡Ó4.5% and 98.0¡Ó0.8% chromosomes of the desired bull respectively. But, collection of semen from grandsons of the same son do not improve the conservation efficiency, four grandsons from the same son can only accumulate 47.0¡Ó2.2% chromosomes of the interested male ancestor. Semen from grandsons of different sons will be helpful to increase the percentage of the desired genomic material reserved when sons¡¦ is not available. Analysis pedigrees of 68 bulls of a semen bank, the 20 most popular ancestors of USA top bulls in 2001were estimated as ideal genomic source individually. Results from pedigree matrices and simulations offer feasible directions in targeting favorite genetic resource. Key words: Matrix pedigree, Simulation, Genetic resources



±ö¤s½Þ»P§ù¬¥§J½ÞÂø¥æ«á¸Ç¤§¤ò¦â¤Î¦Õ¦·ÅãÁô©Ê¿ò¶Ç


±ö¤s½Þ»P§ù¬¥§J½ÞÂø¥æ«á¸Ç¤§¤ò¦â¤Î¦Õ¦·ÅãÁô©Ê¿ò¶Ç

±i¦ù¹ü §õÀA¨¬ ªLÌÉ»T ³\®Ê»« §õ¥@©÷ Ò\®ü«n §d©ú­õ ±i¨qÆq

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

½Þ¤ò¦â¤Î¦Õ¦·¤U««¤§¿ò¶Ç°ò¦]¡A±`³Q»{¬°¬OÅãÁô©Ê¿ò¶Ç¡A¥ç´¿³Q»{¬°»P½Þ¦×ªº­·¨ý¦³Ãö¡C¦Õ¤U««ªº¶Â¦â±ö¤s½Þ(M)»P¥ß¦Õªº¬õ´Ä¦â§ù¬¥§J½Þ(D)¤§Âø¥æ«á¸Ç©ó¥X¥Í®É¬ö¿ý¨ä¤ò¦â¡A¤ò¦â°Ï¤À¬°¶Â¦â(B)¡B¶Âª÷´³(L)¡B¬õª÷´³(Q)¤Î¬õ¦â(R)µ¥¥|ºØ¡CM»PD¥¿¤ÏÂø¥æ¤§Âø¥æ¤@¥N(F1)¥J½Þ¤ò¦â¬°L¡BB¡BR»PQ¨Ì§Ç¦³50.6¡B47.3¡B2.15»P0.0%¡CF1¥æ°t©Ò²£¥ÍÂø¥æ¤G¥N(F2)¤§¥J½Þ¤ò¦â¬°L¡BB¡BR»PQ¤À§O¬°18.7¡B57.0¡B11.3¤Î13.0%¡CF1¥À½Þ¦^¥æD¤½½Þ©Ò²£¥Í¥J½Þ¤ò¦â¬°L¡BB¡BR»PQ¤À§O¬°30.9¡B27.4¡B27.1¤Î14.6%¡C¥J½Þ©ó70¤éÄÖ¬ö¿ý¨ä¯¸¥ß®É¦Õ¦·©Êª¬¡A¨Ì¾Ú«e¶É¤U««ªº¦Õ¦y©Ò¦b¦ì¸m¡A¦Ó°Ï¤À¬°¤­ºØ¦Õ¦·¡Gµu¥ß¦Õ(¦Õ¦y¥¼»\²´)¡Bµu««¦Õ(¦Õ¦y¥¼¶W¹L²´»P»ó§kºÝ¤§¤¤½u)¡B¤¤««¦Õ(¦Õ¦y¦Ü²´»P»ó§kºÝ¤§¤¤½u)¡B««¦Õ(¦Õ¦y¶W¹L²´»P»ó§kºÝ¤§¤¤½u)»Pªø««¦Õ(¦Õ¦y»P»ó§k»ô©Î¶W¹L)¡CF1¥J½Þ¦Õ¦·¬°µu««¦Õ¡B¤¤««¦Õ»P««¦Õ¤À§O¬°16.3¡B64.6¤Î19.1%¡AF2¥J½Þ¦Õ¦·¬°µu««¦Õ¡B¤¤««¦Õ»P««¦Õ¤À§O¬°30.0¡B40.0¤Î20.0%¡CF1¥J½Þ»PF2¥J½Þªº¤ò¦âÀW²v²Å¦XÁB¥¿¥d¤è¤À¥¬©Ò¶i¦æ¿ò¶Ç¤ÀÂ÷¾A¦X«×´ú©w¡A¨ä¦ô­È£q2¦ô­È»P²z½×­È¬Û²Å¡F¦ýF1¥À½Þ¦^¥æD¤½½Þ©Ò²£¥J½Þ¡A«h¥X²{L»PB¤ñ²v»·¸û¥¿±`¤ÀÂ÷¤ñ²v°ª¡CF2¥J½Þ¨Ã¥¼¦³µu¥ß¦Õ©Mªø««¦Õ¡AÅã¥Ü¦Õ¦·¤j¤p¨Ã«D³æ¤@ÅãÁô©Ê°ò¦]©Ò±±¨î¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G±ö¤s½Þ¡B§ù¬¥§J½Þ¡B½§¦â¡B¦Õ¦·¤j¤p¡C

¡@

DOMINANCE AND RECESSIVE INHERITANCE ON COAT COLOR AND
EAR SIZE OF HYBRID PIGLETS BETWEEN MEISHAN AND DUROC BREEDS

S. C. Chang, F. C. Lee, M. J. Lin, C. B. Hsu, S. C. Lee, H. N. Twu, M. C. Wu and H. L. Chang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Generally, lop ear is dominant and prick recessive. Uniform black coat color is dominant and uniform red is recessive. Quite apart from personal preferences and the desire to use color and ear as the meat badge of taste quality. Coat color and ear size traits of hybrid piglets between Meishan (M) and Duroc (D) breeds were recorded at birth. M has black coat color and D has red coat color. M has lop ears and D has prick ears. Coat color was classified into black (B), golden longitudinal stripes of black (L), golden longitudinal stripes of red (Q) and red(R). Frequency of L, B, R and Q coat color in hybrid piglets (F1) between M and D were 50.6, 47.3, 2.15 and 0.0%, respectively. The coat color of F2 piglets with L, B, R and Q patterns were 18.7, 57.0, 11.3 and 13.0%, respectively. In analysis of piglets produced from F1 sows and backcrossing with D boars, L, B, R and Q coat color were 30.9, 27.4, 27.1 and 14.6%, respectively. At 70 days of age, piglets were examined on their ears while standing. The lop-eared pig had a larger ear in size than those of prick-eared pigs. Therefore, according the position of the tip of ear short near to the eye or long enough to the snout, five types were designated: short-prick ear (short near to the eye), short-lop ear (between eye and snout but near to eye), medium-lop ear (between eye and snout but in half way), lop ear (between eye and snout but near to snout), and long-lop ear (over the snout). F1 piglets with short-lop, medium-lop or lop ear were 16.3, 64.6 and 19.1%, respectively. F2 piglets with short-lop, medium-lop or lop ear were 30.0, 40.0 and 20.0%, respectively. The values of adjusted £q2 test on goodness of fit for Mendelian segregation of F1 and F2 hybrid piglets between M and D. The segregation percentage of coat color in piglets from F1 sow sired by D boars was greater than control did. There were no short-prick or long-lop eared piglets in F2 generation, which indicated that the ear size was not inherited as a single dominant gene.

Key Words: Pig, Coat color, Ear.



»OÆW¦a°Ï¶Â¦â½Þ°¦ªº°ò¦]²Õ¤Î²É½uÅéDNA¤ÀªR


»OÆW¦a°Ï¶Â¦â½Þ°¦ªº°ò¦]²Õ¤Î²É½uÅéDNA¤ÀªR

ÃC©À·O(1) À¹Á¾(2) ¶À¤ì¬î(3)

(1)¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò (2)¦¨¥\¤j¾Ç (3)¤¤¿³¤j¾Ç

¬°¤F¸Ñ»OÆW¦U¦a°Ï¶Â¦â½Þ°¦°ò¦]²Õ¤Î²É½uÅéDNA¤§®t²§¡A¤DÀ³¥Î³{¾÷¼W´ÞDNA¦hºA©Ê«ü¯¾¡B²É½uÅéDNA³æªÑºc§Î¦hºA©Ê¤ÎDNA§Ç¦C¤ÀªR§Þ³N¡A±N¨Ó¦Û»OÆW¹Å¸q¡B¤T®l¡B²H¤ô¡B¾ðªL¡BÃö¼q¡B ®oØÝ¡B¹ü¤Æ¤Î¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò¯b¸Õ¶Â½Þ¤@¸¹¤§¼Ë«~¶i¦æ°ò¦]²Õ¤Î²É½uÅéDNA¤§®t²§¤ÀªR¡A¨Ã¥H»OÆW¦a°Ï²{¦³¤§¬v«~ºØ¯ÂºØ½Þ°¦ªÌ°µ¤ñ¸û¡C¥H³{¾÷¼W´ÞDNA¦hºA©Ê«ü¯¾¤ÀªRµ²ªG¬°¡G1.¤ñ¸û¯b¸Õ¶Â½Þ¤@¸¹»P¦U¦a°Ï¶Â¦â½Þ°¦ªº¿ò¶Ç¬Û¦ü©Ê¡A®oØÝ»PÃö¼q¨â¦a°Ï¶Â¦â½Þ°¦»P¯b¸Õ¶Â½Þ¤@¸¹¬Û¦ü©Ê¸û°ª(0.894»P0.876)¡C2.­Y¥H®ç¶éºØ¡B§ù¬¥§J¡Bº~¥¬®L¤Î½L§J®L¥|­Ó«~ºØ»P¦U¦a°Ï¶Â¦â½Þ°¦¶i¦æ¿ò¶Ç¬Û¦ü©Ê¤ÀªR¡A¹Å¸q¡B¹ü¤Æ¡B¤T®l¤Î¾ðªL¶Â¦â½Þ°¦¦U¤À§O»P®ç¶éºØ¬Û¦ü©Ê¸û°ª¡A¦ÓÃö¼q¡B²H¤ô¤Î®oØݶ¦â½Þ°¦«h¦U¤À§O»P§ù¬¥§J¬Û¦ü©Ê¸û°ª¡C¥Ñ²É½uÅéDNA³æªÑºc§Î¦hºA©Ê¤ÀªRµ²ªG±oª¾¡A¥i¨ÌÀô±a¤§§ÎºA±N¤§¤À¥X¥|ºØ¹qªaºA¼Ë(©w¬°A, B, C¤ÎDºA¼Ë)¡C¼Ú¬ü«~ºØ½Þ°¦ªº²É½uÅéDNA³æªÑºc§Î¦hºA©Ê¹qªaºA¼Ë¬Ò¦³A ºA¼Ë¡A¦Ó¨È¬w«~ºØ½Þ°¦ªº²É½uÅéDNA³æªÑºc§Î¦hºA©Ê¹qªaºA¼Ë«hµLAºA¼Ë¡AÃö¼q¦a°Ï¶Â¦â½Þ°¦ªº²É½uÅéDNA³æªÑºc§Î¦hºA©ÊºA¼Ë¬Ò¬°AºA¼Ë¡A¥Ñ¦¹µ²ªGÅã¥Ü¨ä»Û¿Ëª«½è¨Ó¦Û¼Ú¬ü«~ºØ¡C©Ò¦³°Ñ¸Õ¶Â¦â½Þ°¦ªº³æªÑºc§Î¦hºA©ÊºA¼Ë¤À§G¬°107 A ( 43.7%)¡A47 B ( 19.2%)¡A31 C ( 12.6%)¤Î60 D ( 24.5%)ºA¼Ë¡C²É½uÅéDNA D-loop°Ï°ìDNA¤ù¬q§Ç¦C¤ÀªRÅã¥Ü»OÆW¦U¦a°Ï¶Â¦â½Þ°¦¿ò¶Ç®t²§¤¶©ó0.00¡ã4.84 %¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¶Â¦â½Þ°¦¡B°ò¦]²ÕDNA¡B²É½uÅéDNA¡C

¡@

STUDIES ON THE GENOMIC AND MITOCHONDRIAL DNA OF BLACK PIGS IN TAIWAN

N. T. Yen(1), C. Tai(2) and M. C. Huang(3)

(1)Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, (2)National Cheng Kung University, (3)National Chung Hsing University In order to investigate the characterizations of genomic and mitochondrial DNA among black pigs raised in Taiwan. The randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting, single strand conformation polymorphism of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and DNA sequencing techniques were employed for the studies. The animal DNA samples were collected from the areas in Chiai, Sanshia, Danshuei, Shulin, Guanmiaw, Emei, Changhua and Taiwan Livestock Research Institute (TB). Some foreign pure breeds of pigs were used for the control. The results of RAPD fingerprinting analysis showed that: 1. To compare the between-population genetic similarity between TB and black pigs from the other areas, the black pigs from two areas, Emei and Guanmiaw, were higher than the other areas (0.894 and 0.876). 2. To consider the between-population genetic similarity between black pigs of all areas in Taiwan and four pure breeds, Taoyuan, Duroc, Hampshire and Berkshire, the genetic characteristic of black pigs that came from Chiai, Changhua, Sanshia and Shulin were closely related to Taoyuan, and the genetic characteristic of black pigs that came from Guanmiaw, Danshuei and Emei were closely related to Duroc. Four types of SSCP band patterns (designated as A, B, C and D) were identified. ¡¥A¡¦ type of SSCP pattern was in all European-American breeds, but not in Asian breed. SSCP patterns of all black pigs that came from Guanmiaw area belonged to ¡¥A¡¦ type, this result indicated that their maternal parents were diverged from European-American breed. SCP analysis of black pigs of Taiwan revealed that the distributions for four SSCP patterns were 107 A (43.7%), 47 B (19.2%), 31 C (12.6%) and 60 D (24.5%). DNA sequence analysis of mtDNA D-loop region showed the genetic diversity among black pigs of all areas ranged from 0.00 to 4.84 %.

Key Words: Black pig, Genomic DNA, Mitochondrial DNA.



¥xÆW¯b²£ºØ­ì»ï¥sÁn¸ê®Æ®w¤§«Ø¥ß


¥xÆW¯b²£ºØ­ì»ï¥sÁn¸ê®Æ®w¤§«Ø¥ß

§õ¥@©÷ ¿à¥Ã¸Î ¶À౹Š±i¨qÆq

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¥»¬ã¨s¤§¥Øªº¬°¦¬¶°¥xÆW¯b²£ºØ­ì¦UºØ¤£¦P¥Í¬¡¦æ¬°Án­µÀÉ¡A«Ø¥ß¥xÆW¯b²£ºØ­ìÁn­µ¸ê®Æ®w¡A¨Ã¤ñ¸ûª«ºØ¶¡»ï¥sÁn­µªº±T²§«×¡C²Ä¤@´Á§@·~¦@¦¬¿ýÂû¡BÀn¡B¤û¡B¦Ï¡B°¨»P½Þªº¤£¦P¦¨ªø´Á»ï¥sÁn­µ¡A»s¦¨WAV®æ¦¡¯ÂÁn­µÀÉ¡A¨Ã¶i¦æÀWÃФÀªR¡A¤Î´£¨Ñºô»Úºô¸ô½u¤W¤U¸ü(http://www.angrin.tlri.gov.tw/)¡CÀWÃФÀªRµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡A¯b²£ºØ­ì»ï¥sÁn­µ¨ã¦³Â×´Iªº¦h¼Ë©Ê¡A®a¸Vªº¶¡·²µu«ùÄò©Ê­µªi¸û®a¯b¥X²{ÀWÁc¡A¥®¸V¯b¥D°ò­µ­µÀW(¦p¥_¨Ê¥JÀn3456Hz)¸û¦¨¸V¯b(¦p¥_¨Ê¦¨Àn1257Hz)°ª¡A¦Ó¬Ûªñª«ºØ¶¡¥ç¦s¦b·¥¤jªº®t²§¡A¦p¤ô¤û±`µo¥Xµu¦Ó°ªªº»ï¥sÁn¦ý¨Å¤û«h¸û±`µo¥X§C¦Ó«ùÄòªºªø­µ¡C¯b²£°Êª«»ï¥s­µªº¦¬¿ý°£¤F¥i¥R¹ê°ê®a¦h¤¸¤Æ¦ÛµM¬ì¾Ç±Ð§÷¥~¡A¨Ã¥i»P¨ä¥¦³]³Æµ²¦X(¦p¿ý­µ´Î¡Bµo±¡°»´ú¾¹¡Bº^¨Å¾÷±ñ»P¥J¯b¤H¤u­÷¨Å¾¹µ¥)¡A¨ó§U¯b¸s¥Í²£ºÞ²z¾¹±ñ¬ãµo»P¯b²£¾¸­µºÞ±±¬ã¨s¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡GÁn­µ¸ê®Æ®w¡B®a¯b¸V¡B­µÃФÀªR

¡@

CONSTRUCTION AN INTEGRATED SOUND DATABASE FOR
LIVESTOCKS IN TAIWAN

S. C. Lee, Y. Y. Lai, Y. C. Huang and H. L. Chang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

The objective of this study is to collect sound resources of farm animals to construct a sound database of Taiwan livestock and to compare their diversities. In phase I, "normal" sounds in different growth stages were collected for chickens, ducks, cows, goats, horses and pigs, which are recorded in digital format WAV files. A web page (http://www.angrin.tlri.gov.tw/) was designed for download or real-time playing the sound files. From sound spectrum analysis, high diversity existed in livestock of Taiwan. Poultry play short time sound with blank period inserted more often than other stocks. Major base tone of livestock is higher in early growth stage than mature stage (e.g., 3456Hz vs. 1257Hz sampled for duckling and fully developed Peking ducks). Significant difference between sound spectrum patterns was found among animals with phenotypes alike, e.g., buffalo often plays a short and high sound, but dairy cow play a long and low sound instead. The collected livestock sounds in database can be provided as one of good resources for natural science education of Taiwan. The other potential of applications are on improving machines and facilities for livestock management and noise control in livestock production.

Key Words: Sound database, Livestock, Spectrum analysis.



°ª¨Å¶q¤û¸s¨Å½è©Êª¬¿ï©Þ


°ª¨Å¶q¤û¸s¨Å½è©Êª¬¿ï©Þ

§d©ú­õ ±iµâ²p §õ¯À¬Ã ´¿«C¶³ ³¯§Ó¼Ý §õ¥@©÷ ¶À౹Š±i¨qÆq

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¨Å¶q»P¨Å½è¬Oªc¨Å¤û¸s§ï¨}ªº­«­n¸gÀ٩ʪ¬¡C¨Å½è©Êª¬¦³¯×ªÕ²v¡B³J¥Õ½è²v¡B¨Å¿}²v©MÅé²Ó­M¼Æ¡C¨Å«~¤u¼t³vº¥ª`­«¥Í¨ÅÅé²Ó­M¼Æ¡A¨Ã­n¨D¹T¹A¥Í²£°ª«~½èªº¥Í¨Å¡A¦]¦¹¡A¨Å½è©Êª¬¿ï©Þ¬O¤û¸s¨|ºØªº­«­n¶µ¥Ø¡C¦b2001¦~1¤ë¦Ü10¤ë´Á¶¡¡A°Ñ¥[­Ó§O¤û°¦¨Å¼Ë«~½èÀË´ú¤á¦³290¤á¡A¥Í¨Å¨Å¼Ë­p¦³148251ÀY¦¸¡C¦b¤£ÁB¥¿­Ó§O¨Å¶q®É¡A¨C¤é¨Å¶q¥­§¡21.4¢V¡A¯×ªÕ²v¥­§¡3.82%¡A³J¥Õ½è²v¥­§¡3.27%¡A³J¥Õ½è¯×ªÕ¤ñ¥­§¡0.90¡A¨Å¿}²v¥­§¡4.66%¡AÁ`©T§Îª«(%)¥­§¡12.45%¡AÅé²Ó­M¼Æ¥­§¡41.5¸U¡þ²@¤É¡CÅé²Ó­M¼Æªº³õ¥­§¡¦b30¸U¡þ²@¤É¥H¤ºªÌ¡A¦³93¤á¡A¶i¤@¨B¤ñ¸ûÁ`©T§Îª«§t¶qªº³õ¥­§¡¡A¦b12.45¢M¥H¤WªÌ¡A¦³42¤á¡C·í¥H®L©u7¤ë¥÷¨Å¶q¬°°ò·Ç¡A§â¶W¥X±Ú¸s¥­§¡ªÌ¡Aµø¬°¨Å¶q°ªªº¤û¸s¡A¨Ã´N­Ó§O¤û¤©¥H­pºâ¨Å½è¿ï©Þ«ü¼Æ¡A¿z¿ï«áªº¥À¤û¸s¥iµn¿ý¬°­@¼ö«~¨t¡C¦b2001¦~7¤ë°Ñ¥[¨Å½èÀË´úªºªc¨Å¤û¦³16384ÀY¡A¨ä305-2X-ME¨Å¶q¤§¥­§¡¬°6336¢V¡A³õ¥­§¡¶W¹L6336¢VªÌ¦³48¤á¡A³Ì°ªªÌ¦³7751¢V¡A³o¨Ç³õ¤À§G©ó­]®ß¡B¹ü¤Æ¡B¶³ªL¡B¹Å¸q¡B¥x«n¡B°ª¶¯©M«ÌªF¦a°Ï¡A¦û·í¤ëDHI°Ñ´ú¤û¸s22%¡C¯×ªÕ²v¡B³J¥Õ½è²v¡B¨Å¿}²v©MÅé²Ó­M¼Æµ¥¨Å½è©Êª¬¿ï©Þ¤û¸s¬O¥HÁ`©T§Îª«§t¶q¡B³J¥Õ½è¯×ªÕ¤ñ©MÅé²Ó­M¼Æ©Ò²Õ¦¨ªº¿ï©Þ«ü¼Æ¡A¥À¤û¨Ì¿ï©Þ«ü¼Æ°t»P¶i¤fªº§N­áºë²G¡A§ï¶i¥Ø¼Ð¨C¤é¨Å¶q¥­§¡28.8¢V¡AÁ`©T§Îª«(%)¥­§¡13.44%¡AÅé²Ó­M¼Æ¥­§¡26.6¸U¡þ²@¤É¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¨Å¤û¡B¨Å½è¡B¿ï©Þ¡C

¡@

SELECTION ON MILK QUALITY IN HIGH YIELDING DAIRY COWS

M.C. Wu, C.L. Chang, S.J. Lee, C.Y. Tseng, J.Y. Chen, S.C. Lee, Y.C. Huang and H.L. Chang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Milk yield and quality are major economic traits of dairy herd improvement. Milk quality traits are fat%, protein%, lactose%, and somatic cell counts (SCC). In order to meet the requirements of modern dairy factory with an upper limit of 300,000 cells/ml on SCC, selection on milk quality is a major concern in dairy herd improvement program at present. In analysis of 148251 milk samples from January to October of 2001on 290 farms, means for daily yield of milk was 21.4 Kg with 3.82% of fat, 3.27% of protein, 4.66% of lactose, 12.45% of total solid content, and 415,000 cells/ml of SCC. There were 93 farms with their SCC values were less than 300, 00cells/ml, furthermore, 42 farms with the total solid content greater than 12.45%. Therefore, selection index will be formed with total solid content, protein to fat ratio and SCC after mid-term lactation. In July of 2001, the population mean of 305-2X-ME milk yield was 6336 Kg from 16384 milking cows. High yielding dairy herd was defined as herd with milking yield mean greater than population mean, 6336kg. A total of 48 herds were classified as high yielding herds with mean of top one herd being 7751Kg. Farms of 48 high yielding herds were scattered along western region of Taiwan, which accounted for 22% of total testing herds concurrently. Quota of frozen semen with high breeding value will be distributed by selection index. The selection goals of the high yielding population are 28.8 Kg daily yield, total solid content 13.44% and SCC 266,000 cells/ml.

Key words: Cow, Milk quality, Selection.
¥xÆW¯b²£ºØ­ìª¾ÃÑ®w - https://agrkb.angrin.tlri.gov.tw