²Ä¤G¤Q¤E¨÷(2000) shuYing - 2000-09-22
¥Íªø©Êª¬¿ï©Þ16¦~½Þ¸s¤§²£¥J©Êª¬¿ò¶ÇÁͶջP¿ò¶Ç°Ñ¼Æ¦ô­p

±i¨qÆq ¿à¥Ã¸Î §d©ú­õ

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

À³¥Î¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò¨|ºØ³õ1981¦Ü1997¦~¶¡¥X¥Í¤§1977ÀY¯ÂºØ¥À½Þ(ÂÅ·ç´µ891ÀY¡B¬ù§J®L500ÀY»P§ù¬¥§JºØ586ÀY¡^©ó1982¦Ü1998¦~¶¡¤À®Yªº6593­L²£¥J©Ê¯à(¥]¬A¤À®YÁ`¥J¼ÆLS¡B¤À®Y¬¡¥J¼ÆLSA»P¤T¶gÄÖºÛ¥J¼ÆLS3)¡A¶i¦æ¿ò¶ÇÁͶջP¿ò¶Ç°Ñ¼Æ¦ô­p¡C±Ä¥Î¦h©Êª¬½u©Ê²V¦X¼Ò¦¡°t¦X­­¨î³Ì¤j¦üµMªk(REML)¦ôºâ¦U¶µÅܤè»P¦@Åܤ覨¥÷¡A¼Ò¦¡¥]¬A«~ºØ¡B¤À®Y²£¦¸¡B¥À½Þ¥X¥Í»P¤À®Y©u¸`(²D»P¼ö©u)µ¥©T©w®ÄÀ³¡A¦Ó¥À½Þ¤§²Ö¥[©Ê¿ò¶Ç®ÄÀ³¡B¦PºÛ¥X¥Í¦@¦P®ÄÀ³»P´Ý®tµ¥¬°³{¾÷®ÄÀ³¡CLS¡BLSA»PLS3¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§²v¦ô­È¬°0.091¡B0.099»P0.095¡A¦PºÛ¥X¥Í¤§¦@¦PÀô¹Ò®ÄÀ³¦ô­È¬°0.047¡B0.033»P0.024¡C©Êª¬¶¡¿ò¶Ç¬ÛÃö¦ô­È§¡¦b0.85¥H¤W(0.863 ~ 0.938)¡CLS¡BLSA»PLS3¨ãÅãµÛªº«~ºØ»P¤À®Y²£¦¸®ÄÀ³(P¡Õ0.001)¡A¥B¥À½Þªº¥X¥Í»P¤À®Y©u¸`¹ï¨ä²£¥J©Ê¯àLSA»PLS3§¡¦³ÅãµÛªº¼vÅT¡F¥X¥Í©Î¤À®Y©ó²D©uªº¥À½ÞÅãµÛ¦a¦³¸û¤jªº¥X¥Í¬¡¥J¼Æ»P¤T¶gÄÖºÛ¥J¼Æ(P¡Õ0.05»PP¡Õ0.001)¡Cªí«¬»P¿ò¶ÇÁͶէ¡§e²{¤U­°ªºÁͶÕ(-0.083 ~ -0.031»P-0.132 ~ -0.049ÀY/ºÛ/¦~)¡Aªí«¬¤è­±¥H¬ù§J®LºØ(-0.132ÀY/ºÛ/¦~)¤§¦~¤U­°´T«×¬°³Ì¤j¡F¿ò¶ÇÁͶճ¡¥÷¡A°£LS3¥~¡A¥ç¥H¬ù§J®LºØ(-0.083ÀY/ºÛ¦~)¤§¦~¤U·Æ´T«×¬°³Ì¤j¡C¦P®É¡A¦U©Êª¬¿ò¶ÇÁͶզû¨äªí«¬ÁͶդ§¦Ê¤À²v¡A¦bÂÅ·ç´µ¡B¬ù§J®L»P§ù¬¥§JºØ¤À§O¬°59.6 ~ 75.5%¡B46.4 ~ 62.9%»P59.7 ~ 85.7%¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡GºØ½Þ¡B¿ò¶ÇÁͶաB¿ò¶Ç°Ñ¼Æ¡B²£¥J©Ê¯à¡C

¡@

EVALUATION OF GENETIC TRENDS AND PARAMETERS FOR LITTERING
PERFORMANCES IN GROWTH SELECTION-BASED HERD AFTER 16 YEARS

H. L. Chang, Y. Y. Lai and M. C. Wu

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Record of littering performance data on 891 Landrace, 500 Yorkshire and 586 Duroc pigs in Taiwan Livestock Research Institute between 1982 and 1998 were used. A total of 6593 litters from 1977 sows born between 1981 and 1997 were analyzed. Traits were litter size at birth (LS) and born alive (LSA) as well as litter size at 3 weeks of age (LS3). Mixed linear model via REML for multiple trait analysis was employed for estimation of variance-covariance components. Model for individual genetic evaluations included breed, parity, birth and farrowing seasons of sows as fixed effects, and additive genetic effects, common litter effects and error as random effects. Estimates of heritability from additive genetic variances for LS, LSA and LS3 were 0.091, 0.099 and 0.095. The corresponding estimates for common litter effect were 0.047, 0.033 and 0.024, respectively. Genetic correlation estimates were larger than 0.85 among traits considered (0.863 ~ 0.938). LS, LSA and LS3 differed among breeds and parities (P¡Õ0.001). Significant seasonal effects were also found in LSA and LS3. Sows born or farrowing in cool season produced larger LSA and LS3 than those in hot season (P¡Õ0.05 and P¡Õ0.001, respectively). However, both estimates of phenotypic and genetic trends for traits considered were negative (-0.083 ~ -0.031 and -0.132 ~ -0.049 piglets/litter/year). Yorkhsire sows showed the largest yearly phenotypic decrease (-0.132 piglets/litter/year). Similar trend was also observed in genetic evaluation among sow breeds except LS3. Furthermore, genetic trends accounted for 59.6 ~ 75.5%, 46.4 ~ 62.9% and 59.7 ~ 85.7% of phenotypic trends in Landrace, Yorkshire and Duroc breeds, respectively.

Key Words: Swine breeding stock, Genetic trend, Genetic parameter, Littering performance.



¥Íªø½Þ¬¡Åé¶W­µªi±½´y»P±OÅé©Êª¬¤§¿ò¶Ç»Pªí«¬¬ÛÃö



¥Íªø½Þ¬¡Åé¶W­µªi±½´y»P±OÅé©Êª¬¤§¿ò¶Ç»Pªí«¬¬ÛÃö

¿à¥Ã¸Î ±i¨qÆq ¼BÀA±ø §õ¥@©÷ §d©ú­õ

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

À³¥Î¶W­µªi§Y®ÉÅã¹³»ö¡]Aloka SSD-500 B-¼Ò¦¡¡^±½´y¤£¦P¤ëÄÖ¡]4.0¡B4.5»P5.0¤ëÄÖ¡^¥Íªø½Þ¤§²Ä¤Q¦Ø°©³B¸y²´­±¿n»P¦P³¡¦ìªø¶b¤¤ÂI1/2³B­I¯×«p«×¡A¶i¦Ó¦ô­p¤£¦P±½´y¤éÄ֩ʪ¬¶¡¤§¿ò¶Ç°Ñ¼Æ»P¬ÛÃö¡C¦P®É¡A³{¾÷¿ï¨ú150ÀY¹F110¤½¤ç¤§§¹À˽ް¦¡A¶i¦æ±O«e¬¡Åé­«¡B²Ä¤Q¦Ø°©³B­I¯×«p«×©M¸y²´­±¿n¡A¥H¤Î±O«áÅé­«¡B±OÅéªø¡B¥­§¡­I¯×«p«×¡B³Ì«á¦Ø°©³B­I¯×«p«×¡B²Ä¤Q¦Ø°©³B¸y²´­±¿n¡B±O®_²v»P½G¦×²v¶¡¤§¿ò¶Ç»Pªí«¬¬ÛÃö±´°Q¡C²Î­p¤ÀªR«Y¥H¦h©Êª¬½u©Ê²V¦X¼Ò¦¡°t¦X­­¨î³Ì¤j¦üµMªk¡]REML¡^¦ôºâÅܤè»P¦@Åܤ覨¥÷¡A²Î­p¼Ò¦¡¥]¬A«~ºØ¡B©Ê§O¡B¥X¥Í²£¦¸»P¥X¥Í©u¸`µ¥©T©w®ÄÀ³¡A¥H¤Î²Ö¥[©Ê¿ò¶Ç®ÄÀ³¡B¦PºÛ¥X¥Í¦@¦P®ÄÀ³»P´Ý®tµ¥³{¾÷®ÄÀ³¡Cµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡G¤£¦P¤ëÄÖ¬¡Åé©Êª¬ªí«¬Åܤè¦ô­ÈÀH¤ëÄÖ¼W¥[¦Ó¼W¤j¡F¥B°£4.5©M5.0¤ëÄÖ¤§¬¡Åé­I¯×»P5.0¤ëÄÖÅé­«¥~¡A¨ä¾l©Êª¬¤§¦PºÛ¥X¥Í¤§¦@¦P®ÄÀ³§¡¸û²Ö¥[©Ê¿ò¶Ç®ÄÀ³¤j¡C¦P®É¡A¦b¥»¬ã¨sµû¦ô¤§¦U©Êª¬¤¤¡A²Ö¥[©Ê¿ò¶Ç®ÄÀ³»P¦PºÛ¥X¥Í¤§¥þ¦P­MÅã©Ê®ÄÀ³§¡¦ûªí«¬Åܲ§50%¥H¤W¡C¦¹¥~¡A¥Ñ¿ò¶Ç¬ÛÃö¦ô­Èµo²{¡A§¹À˽ް¦±O«e¬¡Åé±½´y©Êª¬»P¹ïÀ³¤§±OÅé©Êª¬§¡§eÅãµÛªº¿ò¶Ç¥¿¬ÛÃö¡]rG¡×0.233 ~ 0.843¡AP¡Õ0.05¡^¡F¦Ó¸g¥ÑPearson¬ÛÃö¤ÀªR©Ò¦ô±o¤§ªí«¬¬ÛÃö¦ô­È¡A°£±O«e¬¡Åé­I¯×»P±OÅé¸y²´­±¿n¬°­t­È¥~(rP¡×-0.184)¡A¾l§¡»P¿ò¶Ç¬ÛÃö¨ã¬Û¦PªºÁͶաF±©¦U¦ô­È§¡¸û¤p¡]rG¡×0.515 ~ 0.843 vs. rP¡×0.443 ~ 0.622¡^¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G½Þ¡B¿ò¶Ç¬ÛÃö¡B¶W­µªi´ú©w¡B±OÅé©Êª¬¡C

¡@

GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC CORRELATION AMONG ULTRASOUND
AND CARCASS MEASUREMENTS IN GROWING PIGS

Y. Y. Lai, H. L. Chang, C. T. Liu, S. C. Lee and M. C. Wu

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Aloka Model SSD-500 B-mode real-time ultrasound scanner was used to scan growing pigs at 4.0, 4.5 and 5.0 months of age. Ultrasound measurements of loin muscle area at the tenth rib and 1/2 point overlying fat were taken for genetic parameter estimation and correlation analysis. 150 off-tested pigs near 110 ¢V live weight were also randomly sampled to evaluate the genetic and phenotypic correlation for measurements taken before (live weight, ultrasound measurements of backfat and loin muscle area at the tenth rib) and after (carcass weight, carcass length, average backfat thickness, backfat thickness of the last rib, loin muscle area at the tenth rib, dressing percentage and lean percentage) slaughtered. Mixed linear model via REML for multiple trait analysis was used to estimate variance components. Model used included breed, sex, birth parity and birth season as fixed effects, additive genetic effects, common litter effects and error as random effects. Results showed that estimates of phenotypic variance for ultrasound measurements were increased as age increased. Larger common litter effects than additive genetic ones were observed in most of traits except in ultrasound backfat at 4.5 and 5.0 months of age, and weight at 5.0 months of age. Furthermore, additive genetic and common litter effects accounted for more than 50% of phenotypic variance for traits considered in this study. Positive genetic correlation were found between measurements taken before and after slaughter (rG¡×0.233 ~ 0.843¡AP¡Õ0.05) and similar trend was also obtained in Pearson correlation coefficients of phenotype except the one between backfat taken before slaughtered and loin muscle area of carcass (rP¡×-0.184). However, the estimates of correlation were smaller in phenotype than in genotype (rG¡×0.515 ~ 0.843 vs. rP¡×0.443 ~ 0.622).

Key Words: Pigs, Genetic correlation, Ultrasound measurement, Carcass trait.



¦h²£½ÞºØ¤§°ö¨|I.±ö¤s½Þ»P§ù¬¥§J½ÞÂø¥æ¤§²£¥J©Êª¬



¦h²£½ÞºØ¤§°ö¨|I.±ö¤s½Þ»P§ù¬¥§J½ÞÂø¥æ¤§²£¥J©Êª¬

±i¦ù¹ü ¶À¶®ªâ §õÀA¨¬ Ò\®ü«n ³¯ªÚ¨k §õ¥@©÷ ÃC©À·O §d©ú­õ ±i¨qÆq

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¥À½Þ¥Í²£¤O¬°¾i½Þ²£·~¸gÀٮIJvªº¤@¶µ­«­n¦]¯À¡A¨ä¥D­n²Õ¦¨©Êª¬¬°¤À®YºÛ¥J¼Æ©M­÷¨|´Á¶¡¥J½Þ¨|¦¨²v¡FµM¦]¨ä¬°¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§²v§C¤§©Êª¬¡A¬G«ÜÃø¸g¥Ñ¿ï©Þ¹F¨ì§ï¶iªº¥Øªº¡C¦]¦¹¡AÀ³¥Î¨ã°ªÁc´Þ¤O¤§¤¤°ê¥»¤g½ÞºØ¦p±ö¤s½Þ¡A¶i¦æÂø¥æ§Y¬°¥t¤@¶µ¿ï¾Ü¡C¥»¬ã¨s¦®¦bµû¦ô¦h²£±ö¤s½Þ»P§ù¬¥§J½Þ¥¿¤ÏÂø¥æ¤§²£¥J©Ê¯à¡A´Á¨Ñ§@¿ï¨|¾A¦X¥xÆW¦a°ÏÀô¹Ò®ð­Ô°ªÁc«~¨t½ÞºØ¤§¨Ì¾Ú¡CÀ³¥Î±ö¤s½Þ(M)¤½12ÀY¡B¥À53ÀY»P§ù¬¥§J½Þ(D)¤½24ÀY¡B¥À42ÀY¡A©ó1997¦Ü1999¦~¶¡¶i¦æ¥¿¤ÏÂø¥æ¸ÕÅç¡A­p¤À®Y122ºÛ¡]ªì²£95­L»P¤G²£27­L¡^¡F¨ä¤¤M¡BD¡BMD¡]M¥À½Þ»P°tD¤½½Þ¡^»PDM¡]D¥À½Þ»P°tM¤½½Þ¡^¤À§O¬°18¡B14¡B50»P40­L¡Cµû¦ô©Êª¬¥]¬A¤À®YÁ`¥J¼Æ¡]LS¡^»P¬¡¥J¼Æ¡]LSA¡^¡B¤T¶gÄÖ¡]LS3¡^»PÂ÷¨ÅºÛ¥J¼Æ¡]LSW¡^¡B¤À®Y¬¡¥J½ÞºÛ­«¡]LTRWT¡^¡B¥J½Þ¥X¥Í¡]WT0¡^¡B¤T¶gÄÖ¡]WT21¡^»PÂ÷¨Å¡]WWT¡^¥­§¡Åé­«¡B¥J½Þ¥X¥Í¦s¬¡²v¡]LSA/LS¡×SURV1¡^»P¤T¶gÄÖ¨|¦¨²v¡]LSA/LS3¡×SURV2¡^¡Cµ²ªGµo²{¡G¥À½Þ²£¥J©Ê¯à¨ãÅãµÛªº«~ºØ®ÄÀ³¡AM¥À½ÞÅãµÛ¦a¸ûD¥À½Þ¦³¸û¤jªºLS¡BLSA¡BLS3»PLSW¡]P<0.001¡^¡FµM¨ä¥J½Þ¤§WT0¡BWT21»PWWT¡A«hÅãµÛ¦a¸û»´¡]P<0.001¡^¡C¦P®É¡A¥¿¤ÏÂø¥æµû¦ôµ²ªGÅã¥ÜLS3¡BLSW¡BSURV1¡BSURV2¡BLTRWT¡BWT0»PWT21¨ãÅãµÛªºÂø¥æÀu¶Õ¡A¥B¨ä¦ô­È¤À§O¬°30.1%¡B30.0%¡B17.5%¡B13.5%¡B22.4%¡B7.8%»P10.5%¡]P<0.05¡^¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G±ö¤s½Þ¡B§ù¬¥§J½Þ¡B¥¿¤ÏÂø¥æ¡B²£¥J©Ê¯à¡C

¡@

DEVELOPMENT OF PROLIFIC LINE IN SWINE I. LITTERING
TRAITS OF MEISHAN CROSSING WITH DUROC

S. C. Chang, Y. F. Huang, F. C. Lee, H. N. Twu, F. N. Chen, S. C. Lee, N. T. Yen, M. C. Wu and H. L. Chang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Sow productivity is a major component of the production efficiency in pig industry. Litter size at birth and pre-weaning survival rate are the major component traits. However, these traits are difficult to improve through selection due to their low heritabilities. Crossbreeding could be another way to increase sow productivity by taking advantage of high prolificacy in some native Chinese breeds such as Meishan. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the littering performances of Meishan(M), Duroc(D) and reciprocal crosses(MD and DM defined as M sows sired by D boars and D sows sired by M boars, respectively) for the reference of the outstanding reproductive breeds selection in Taiwan. A total of 36 boars(including 12 M and 24 D breeds, respectively) and 95 sows(including 53 M and 42 D breeds, respectively) were used to produce 122 litters(95 and 27 litters produced at first and second parities, respectively) during 1997 and 1999. The data included 18, 14, 50 and 40 litters of M, D, MD and DM, respectively. Traits evaluated were litter size at birth(LS), born alive(LSA), at three weeks of age(LS3) and at weaned (LSW), litter weight born alive(LTRWT), average piglet weight at birth(WT0), at three weeks of age(WT3) and at weaned(WWT), piglet survival at birth(SURV1¡×LSA/LS) and at three weeks of age(SURV2¡×LSA/LS3). Results showed that sow breed effects was significant for littering traits considered and M sows had larger LS, LSA, LS3 and LSW than D females (P<0.001). However, piglets produced by D sows had heavier WT0, WT21 and WWT than those produced by M sows(P<0.001¡^. Also, the heterosis in LS3, LSW, SURV1, SURV2, LTRWT, WT0 and WT21 for MD and DM were significant (P<0.05¡^with estimates being 30.1%, 30.0%, 17.5%, 13.5%, 22.4%, 7.8% and 10.5%, respectively¡C

Key Words: Meishan pigs, Duroc pigs, Reciprocal crosses, Littering performances.


¦h²£½ÞºØ¤§°ö¨|II.±ö¤s½Þ»P§ù¬¥§J½ÞÂø¥æ¤@¥N¤§¥Íªø©Êª¬



¦h²£½ÞºØ¤§°ö¨|II.±ö¤s½Þ»P§ù¬¥§J½ÞÂø¥æ¤@¥N¤§¥Íªø©Êª¬

¶À¾Ëºa ¶À¶®ªâ Ò\®ü«n ³¯ªÚ¨k §õ¥@©÷ ªL¼w¨| §d©ú­õ ±i¨qÆq

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¥»¬ã¨s¦®¦b±´°Q¦h²£±ö¤s½Þ»P°ª²£¦×§ù¬¥§J½ÞºØ¥¿¤ÏÂø¥æ«á¸Ç½Þ¤§¥Íªø©Ê¯à¡A´Á¨Ñ§@°ö¨|¨ã²£«~°Ï¹j·s«~¨t½ÞºØ¤§¿ò¶Ç¸ê·½¡C¸ÕÅç½Þ¸s¥]¬A±ö¤s½Þ¡]M¡A¤½½Þ60ÀY¡A¤k½Þ64ÀY¡^¡B§ù¬¥§J¡]D¡A¤½½Þ27ÀY¡A¤k½Þ25ÀY¡^¡B§ù¬¥§J¤½½Þ»P°t±ö¤s¥À½Þ¤§«á¸Ç¡]MD¡A¤½½Þ165ÀY¡A¤k½Þ197ÀY¡^©M±ö¤s¤½½Þ»P°t§ù¬¥§J¥À½Þ¤§«á¸Ç¡]DM¡A¤½½Þ97ÀY¡A¤k½Þ112ÀY¡^¡A­p¦³¤½½Þ349ÀY»P¤k½Þ398ÀY¡C°Ñ¸Õ½Þ°¦¥Íªø©Ê¯àÀË©w´Á¶¡¦Û70¦Ü210¤éÄÖ¡A´ú©w©Êª¬¥]¬A70¡]W70¡^¡B90¡]W90¡^¡B120¡]W120¡^¡B150¡]W150¡^¡B180¡]W180¡^»P210¤éÄÖ¡]W210¡^¤§Åé­«¡A¥H¤Î150(BF150)¡B180¡]BF180¡^»P210¤éÄÖ¡]BF210¡^¤§²Ä¤­¦Ø¡B³Ì«á¦Ø»P³Ì«á¸y´ÕÂ÷­I¤¤½u5¤½¤À³B¤§­I¯×«p«×¥­§¡¡C¤½½Þ¦]±Ä­ÓÀˤ覡¶i¦æ¡A¬G¥ç´ú©wÀË©w´Á¶¡¤§¹}®Æ®Ä²v¡]FE¡^¡F¦Ó¤k½Þ«h¥H¸sÀˤ覡¶i¦æ¡C¤ÀªRµ²ªGµo²{¡G¤£½×¤½½Þ©Î¤k½Þ¡A¦U¶¥¬qÅé­«¤£¶È¨ãÅãµÛªº«~ºØ®ÄÀ³¡]P<0.001¡^¡A¥BMD»PDM¤½½Þ»P¤k½Þ§¡¨ãÅãµÛªºÂø¥æÀu¶Õ¡A¨äÂø¥æÀu¶Õ¦ô­È½d³ò¤À§O¬°19.2 ~ 30.0%¡]P<0.001¡^»P10.1 ~ 19.6%(P<0.001)¡C¦b¤½½Þ­I¯×«p«×¤è­±¡A¥¿¤Ï¥æ¡]MD»PDM¡^½Þ°¦¤§BF150¡BBF180»PBF210¦ô­È¥­§¡¡A¤À§OÅãµÛ¦a¸û¯ÂºØ¡]M»PD¡^ªÌ¤§¥­§¡«p8.8¡B10.2»P15.3%¡]P<0.001¡^¡F¦ý¦b¤k½Þ¤è­±¡A¦¹ºØÅãµÛ©Ê®t²§«h¶È¨£©óBF210¡]P<0.001¡^¡C¦¹¥~¡A«~ºØ¶¡®t²§Áö¥ç¨£©ó¤½½Þ¤§FE¡]P<0.001)¡A¦ýÂø¥æÀu¶Õ¦ô­È«h¤£ÅãµÛ¡]P>0.05¡^¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G±ö¤s½Þ¡B§ù¬¥§J½Þ¡B¥¿¤ÏÂø¥æ¡B¥Íªø©Êª¬¡C

¡@

DEVELOPMENT OF PROLIFIC LINE IN SWINE II. GROWTH
TRAITS OF (MEISHAN X DUROC) PIGS

H. J. Huang, Y. F. Huang, H. N. Twu, F. N. Chen, S. C. Lee, D. Y. Lin, M. C. Wu and H. L. Chang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

The objective of this study was to investigate the growth performances of Meishan (M), Duroc (D) and their reciprocal crosses for the reference of potential new strain exploration in Taiwan. Tested herd included growing pigs of M (60 boars and 64 gilts), D (27 boars and 25 gilts), MD defined as the progeny of M sows sired by D boars (165 boars and 197 gilts), and DM defined as the progeny of D sows sired by M boars (97 boars and 112 gilts). A total of 349 boars and 398 gilts were evaluated during 70 an 210 days of age. Traits analyzed were body weights at 70 (W70), 90 (W90), 120 (W120), 150 (W150), 180 (W180) and 210 (W210) days of age, and averaged backfat thickness at 150 (BF150), 180 (BF180) and 210 (BF210) days of age which were measured at 5 cm from dorsal line of the fifth and last ribs as well as the last lumbar. Boars were tested individually and thus the corresponding feed efficiency during testing period was also evaluated. However, tested gilt were group housed without feed consumed information. Result indicated that breed effects was significant for body weights considered in this study (P<0.001). Also, both boars and gilt of MD and DM showed significant heterosis with the range of corresponding estimates being 19.2 ~ 30.0% and 10.1 ~ 19.6% (P<0.001), respectively. Furthermore, the averages of MD and DM boars for BF150, BF180, and BF210 were also 8.8, 10.2 and 15.3% thicker than the averages of M and D for corresponding traits (P<0.001). However, the similar result was only observed for BF210 in gilt (P<0.001) but not in BF150 or BF180. In addition, breed effects was also significant (P<0.001) for FE in boars but estimate of heterosis was not significant (P>0.05).

Key Words: Meishan pigs, Duroc pigs, Reciprocal crosses, Growth performances.



Âû¦Ù¦×³J¥Õ-±Û¥ú§í¨î¯À¡]TnI¡^¦hºA©Ê¬ã¨s



Âû¦Ù¦×³J¥Õ-±Û¥ú§í¨î¯À¡]TnI¡^¦hºA©Ê¬ã¨s

§d´Üµ¾(1) ¼B­^©ú(1) ±i¨qÆq(2) Áé¨qªK(2) ªL¼w¨|(2) §d©ú­õ(2)

(1)°ê¥ß¤¤¿³¤j¾Ç°Êª«¨t (2)¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

±Û¥ú§í¨î¯À¡]TnI¡^¬°¦Ù¦×ÅÖºû¤º­«­nªº¦Ùµ·³J¥Õ¡A¥i½Õ¸`¦Ù¦×¦¬ÁY¬¡©Ê»Pí©w¦ÙÅÖºûµ²ºc¤§¥\¯à¡C¥»¬ã¨s¤§¥D­n¥Øªº¦b±´°Q¤£¦P«~¨t¶¡Âû¦×¤º¦Ùµ·³J¥Õ¤À¤l¦hºA©Êªí²{¤§®t²§©Ê¡C¸ÕÅç²ÕÂû°¦¬°¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò¿ï¨|¤§8¶gÄÖªñ¿Ë«~¨t¤gÂû¡]L7¡BL9¡BL11¡BL12¡^¡B¤G¤¸Âø¥æÂû¡]PS¡^¤Î¤½¤gÂû»P°tµ·¦Ð¡]CW¡^©Î¶Â¦Ð¡]CB¡^¯Q°©¥ÀÂû¤§Âø¥æ«~¨t¡A¦Ó¹ï·Ó²ÕÂû°¦«h±Ä¥Î§{¶¡¤@¯ë¦³¦âÂû°¦¡C°Êª«Ä묹«á¨ú¤U¤j¯Ý¦Ù¡AÀH«á¥h°£²Ó­M½¤ªºµ²ºc»s³Æ¦¨¥h½¤¦ÙÅÖºû¡A¥H­°§C¤ô¸Ñ³J¥Õ¤À¸Ñ¦Ùµ·³J¥Õ¤À¤lªº»Ã¯À¬¡©Ê¡C¦P®ÉÀ³¥Î»E¤þñQ¾®½¦³J¥Õ¹qªa¡]SDS-PAGE¡^¤ÀÂ÷¤£¦P¤À¤l¤j¤p¤§¦Ù¦×³J¥Õ¡A¨Ã¥B§Q¥Î¤À¤l±M¤@©Ê¦Ùµ·³J¥Õ§ÜÅé¿ëÃѦ٦פ¤¯S©wªº³J¥Õ¤À¤l¡C¸ÕÅçÂû°¦¤j¯Ý¦ÙÅÖºû¤ºÁö§¡ªí²{¨âºØ¤£¦P¤À¤l¤j¤pªº±Û¥ú§í¨î¯À¡]¤À¤l¶q¤À§O¬°23.2»P22.6 kD¡^¡A¦ý¤£¦P«~¨t¶¡¦Ù¦×ÅÖºû¤º¤§¤À¤l¦P¤À²§ºcª«¤À§G¤ñ¨Ò¡A«h¦³ÅãµÛªº®t²§¡]P<0.05¡^¡CL7¡BL9¡BL11¡BL12¡BPS¡BCW»PCBÂû°¦¤§¦Ù¦×ÅÖºû¤º°ª¤À¤l¶qTnI¡]23.2 kD¡^ªí²{¤ñ¨Ò¤À§O¬°60.4%¡B68.7%¡B81.1%¡B71.8%¡B26.6%%¡B40%»P57.1%¡AÅã¥ÜL7¡BL9¡BL11¡BL12¥|­Ó¤gÂûªñ¿Ë«~¨t¦Ù¦×¤¤¨ã¦³°ª¤À¤l¶qTnI¬°¥D¡A¦ÓPS¡BCW»PCB«~¨tÂû°¦¦Ù¦×¤¤¨ã¦³§C¤À¤l¶qTnI¬°¥D¡F¦Ó¹ï·Ó²Õ§{¶¡¦³¦âÂû°¦¤§¦Ù¦×ÅÖºû¤º«h¶Èªí²{°ª¤À¤l¶qTnI¡Cµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¤£¦P«~¨t¶¡¦Ù¦×ÅÖºû¤º¤§±Û¥ú§í¨î¯Àªºªí²{¦³«~¨t®t²§¦s¦b¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G±Û¥ú§í¨î¯À¡]TnI¡^¡B¦hºA©Êªí²{¡B¥xÆW¤gÂû¡C

¡@

POLYMORPHIC EXPRESSION OF MYOFILAMENT PROTEIN TROPONIN I IN
THE PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE OF DOMESTIC CHICKENS

K-S Goh(1), Y. M. Liou(1), H. L. Chang(2), H. C. Chung(2), D. Y. Lin(2) and M. C. Wu(2)

(1)National Chung-Hsing University (2)Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Troponin I (TnI) is a regulatory protein of myofilament protein. TnI regulates the contractile activities of muscle and stabilizes the structure of myofilaments. The aim of this study was to investigate if strain-dependent differences of muscle protein expression exist in skeletal muscle of various domestic chickens. Taiwan country chicken inbred lines (L12, L7, L11 and L9), and their hybrid (PS) as well as Silkie-Country hybrids (CW and CB) provided from Taiwan livestock Research Institute (TLRI) were used along with several commercial strains of colored chickens. The Pectoralis Major muscle taken from experimental animals were prepared for chemically skinned muscle fibers in which membranous structures of muscle fibers were removed. This treatment of skinning would decrease the proteinase activity and prevent proteolysis of muscle proteins. SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in combination with immuno-blotting method was used to identify specific myofilament proteins in muscle fibers. Results obtained showed that two different molecular size (MW: Heavy/23.2 kD and Light/22.6 kD) of Troponin I (TnI) expressed in the Pectoralis Major of all chickens from TLRI. However, the expressed ratios of these two TnI isozymes are different in muscle fibers of different strains. The expression of the heavy TnI isozyme in muscle fibers is greater for the strains L12 (71.7%), L7 (60.3%), L11 (81.1%) and L9 (68.7%) than for strains PS (26.6%), CW (40%) and CB (57.1%). Interestingly, only one band of high molecular weight of TnI (23.2 kD) was found in other originated chickens. Thus, polymorphic expression of myofilament proteins in chicken muscles could be strain-specific, and that might provide a means for further characterizing muscle differences between a variety of domestic chickens.

Key Words: Troponin I (TnI), Polymorphic expression, Taiwan country chicken.



²Ö¥[©Ê¿ËÄÝ«Y¼Æ¶ZÂ÷¤À²Õªk»P¥[Á`ªk¿ï¯d"¥Nªí©Ê"ºØ¯b¸s



²Ö¥[©Ê¿ËÄÝ«Y¼Æ¶ZÂ÷¤À²Õªk»P¥[Á`ªk¿ï¯d"¥Nªí©Ê"ºØ¯b¸s

¶À౹ŠªL¼w¨| ±i¨qÆq

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¬°«O¦³¯b¸sªº¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§¡A¥»¸ÕÅç´£¥X¨âºØ¿ï¾ÜºØ¯bªº¤èªk¡A¤èªk¤@¬°§Q¥Î¶ZÂ÷¤À²Õªº¤èªk±N(1-²Ö¥[©Ê¿ËÄÝ«Y¼Æ)µø¬°¶ZÂ÷¡A¦A§Q¥Î©¼¦¹¶¡³Ìµu¶ZÂ÷¶i¦æ¤À¸s(¦psingle linkage ªk)¡A³Ì«á¦A¥Ñ¦U¤l¸s©â¥X¥Nªí¡A±N¦¹©â¥Xªº¶°¦Xµø¬°"¥Nªí©Ê"ºØ¯b¸s¡C¤èªk¤G¬°§Q¥Î²Õ¦Xªº¤èªk¡A¨ú¥X C(N, n )²ÕºØ¯b¸s¡AN ¬°¥þ³¡¯b¸s¼Æ¡An ¬°ÀÀ¿ï¯dªº"¥Nªí"­Ó¼Æ¡A¦A¥[Á`¨â¨â¶¡¦@ 0.5n(n-1) ­Ó²Ö¥[©Ê¿ËÄÝ«Y¼Æ(A ¬°¤W¤T¨¤»P¹ï¨¤½u¬°0ªº¯x°}¡Aa..¬°©Ò¨ä¦³¤¸¯Àaij ¥[Á`)¡A§Y¿ï¥X³Ì¤pªºa..¡A¦¹²Õ¤ºªº¦¨­û§Yµø¬°¿ï¯dªº"¥Nªí"¡C¤èªk¤@¥D­nªº§xÂZ¬°¤l¸s¤º­ÓÅ骺¿ï¾Ü¡A¤èªk¤G«h»Ý­±Á{¤@­Ó¥H¤Wªº¥i¥Nªí¸sªº¿ï¾Ü(a..¬Û¦P¡A³Ì¤p­È¤£°ß¤@)¡CÁöµM§Q¥Î¤À¥Íªº¿ò¶Ç¦hºA©Ê¤À²Õ¡A¦p¦å«¬©Î¬ODNA«ü¯¾µ¥¡A¤]¥i§@¬°­ÓÅ鶡¤À²Õ¿ï¯d"¥Nªí©Ê"¯b¸sªº¤èªk¡CµM¦Ó±Ä¦å¡B¤À¥Í¤ÀªRµ¥¤u§@»Ý­n¬Û·íªº¤H¤O»Pª«¤O¡C±q¾÷²vªºÃöÂI¡A¤À¥Íªº¤À²Õ¤èªk¥u¬O¦b¤@­Ó¤l¶°¦X¤U(¯à³Q«×¶qªº©Êª¬)ªº¤À²Õªk¤§¤@¡A¥B¥ç»Ý­±Á{©Ò´£¤èªk¤@¤¤©Ò­±Á{ªº°ÝÃD¡C¥»¸ÕÅç¡y²Ö¥[©Ê¿ËÄÝ«Y¼Æ¶ZÂ÷¤À²Õªk»P¥[Á`ªk¿ï¯d"¥Nªí©Ê"ºØ¯b¸s¡z´£¨Ñ¤F¸û¸gÀÙªº¿ï¯d¤èªk¡A¥i¥Î©ó¦³­­¸ê·½¤U¡AºØ¯b¸s¯dºØªº°Ñ¦Ò¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G²Ö¥[©Ê¿ËÄÝ«Y¼Æ¡B¤À¸s¡B¶ZÂ÷¡C

¡@

SELECT POPULATION REPRESENTATIVES BY MINIMIZING THE SUMMATION
OR CLUSTERING THE ADDITIVE RELATIONSHIP COEFFICIENTS

Y. C. Huang, D. Y. Lin, and H. L. Chang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

In order to keep the population genetic variation, two methods are proposed to select representative breeding stocks in this study. Method I, distance matrix D=(1-A), where element dij=(1-aij), a function of additive relationship coefficient, aij , is used as distance between two individuals. With linkage methods can cluster animals into n groups, where n is the upper limit of number of selected animals. Each cluster chooses an animal to form the representative set. Method II is to minimize the summation of the additive relationship coefficients of the selected animals. C(N, n) combination sets need be computed for the minimization, and N is the number of candidates. In each set, there is 0.5n(n-1) elements from the lower triangular of matrix A for summation. Individuals in the set with minimum a.. , summation all lower triangular elements, will be the selected representatives. In method I, the main puzzle is how to choose representative for each cluster, and dilemma of the method II is the minimization might not be unique. Although biotechnology such as blood typing or DNA finger prints data can be used to select representatives, the puzzle of method I existed also and need cost for sampling and lab works. Comparing with the molecular methods, the methods proposed in this study are less expensive.

Key Words: Additive relationship coefficient, Cluster, Distance.



¥xÆW¤û¸s¤§¥ÊÓi»Ä¯gÀW²vÀË´ú



¥xÆW¤û¸s¤§¥ÊÓi»Ä¯gÀW²vÀË´ú

¶À౹ŠªL¼w¨| ³¯­Yµ× §dªQÂí ·¨¼w«Â ±i¨qÆq
¿½©vªk ¼B¨q¬w ´¿«C¶³ ±iµâ²p §d©ú­õ

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¥ÊÓi»Ä¯g¬O¤@ºØ¬O¤@ºØ¡§§¿´`Àô¡¨ªº¿ò¶Ç¯Ê³´¯e¯f¡AÂùÁô©Ê¯Â¦X«¬ªº¿©±w¥J¤û¦b¥X¥Í«á¤@¶g¤º´N·|¦º¤`¡C³oºØ¡§§¿´`Àô¡¨ªº¿ò¶Ç¯Ê³´µLªk¥¿±`ªº±Æ®ò¡A­è¥X¥Íªº±o¯fªº¤p¤û¥~Æ[¥¿±`¡AµM¦Ó¤p¤û¥X¥Í«á«o¦]¬°¦Û¤vµLªk¦Û¦æ±Æ¬r¡A¦]¦¹¯«¸g°ÝÃD·|³v¨BªºÄY­«¡A³q±`¥J¯b¦b¤@¶g¤º´N·|¦º¤`¡C¬°¤F¸Ñ¥ÊÓi»Ä¯g¦b¥xÆW¤û°¦¤§¤À¥¬±¡§Î¡A¥»¸ÕÅç¦@ÀË´ú¤»­Óªª³õ(«n³¡¤Î¥_³¡¦U¤T³õ)»P¨Ó¦Û¥_³¡»PªF³¡¦a°Ï°Ñ»P DHI­pµeªº¦Û¯d¤p¤½¤û¡A¥þ³¡¦@ 1690ÀY²üÄõ¨Å¤û¡C±Ä¶°¦å¼Ë«á¡A¶i¦æ¥ÊÓi»Ä¯g DNA°ò¦]«¬Å²©w¡C¦b¥þ³¡ 1690ÀY²üÄõ¨Å¤û¤¤¶ÈÀË´ú¥X¤@ÀYÂø¦X«¬¤û(0.06 %)¡AÅã¥Ü¦¹¤@´¿¼s¦Æµo¥Í¿D¬wªº²üÄõ¤û±Ú¸s¿ò¶Ç¯e¯f¡A¹ï¥»¬Ù¨Å¤û¼vÅT¤£¤j¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¥xÆW¡B²üÄõ¤û¡B¥ÊÓi»Ä¯g¡C

¡@

LOW INCIDENCE OF DEFICIENCY OF CITRULLINEMIA
CARRIERS AMONG DAIRY CATTLE OF TAIWAN

Y. C. Huang, D. Y. Lin, J. C. Chen, S. C. Wu, T. W. Yang, H. L. Chang,
T. F. Shiao, H. C. Liu, C. Y. Tseng , C. L. Chang and M. C. Wu

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Bovine citrullinemia is an autosomal recessive disorder in Holstein cattle that results in calf mortality. Affected calves are unable to get rid of ammonia and display neurological symptoms that become progressively worse, leading to death within one week of birth. For understanding the defect gene frequency of Taiwan Dairy cattle, a total of 1690 samples, Holstein cows and young bulls from different herds, were sampled and tested for genotypes of citrullinemia. With a mutation-specific assay of leukocyte DNA, one heterozygote cow was detected among all samples tested, corresponding to an incidence of 0.06%. With evidence of less than .1%(1/1690=0.06%) carrier, citrullinemia, a serious genetic defect of Holsteins in Australia, is not a significant genetic disease in Taiwan.

Key Words: Taiwan, Holstein, Citrullinemia.



¥xÆWºØ¤½¤û¨tÃлP¿ò¶ÇÀË´ú¸ê®Æ®wºô»Úºô¸ô¤Æ¤§¬ã¨s



¥xÆWºØ¤½¤û¨tÃлP¿ò¶ÇÀË´ú¸ê®Æ®wºô»Úºô¸ô¤Æ¤§¬ã¨s

¶À౹Š½²¨q®e §õ¥@©÷ ±i¨qÆq ¿½©vªk ±iµâ²p §d©ú­õ

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¨Ï¥Î¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò·s¦Ë¤À©Ò¦Û¥Á°ê64¦~°_°O¿ýªº¶i¤f§N­áºë²G¸ê°T¬°°ò¦¡Aµ²¦X¬ü°ê¡B²üÄõ¡B¥[®³¤jµ¥°ê²üÄõ¤û¨ó·|´£¨Ñªº¶i¤f§N­áºë²G¿ò¶ÇÀË´ú¸ê°T¡A»P·s¦Ë¤À©ÒAI¤½¤û¿ò¶ÇÀË´úªº¸ê°T¡A³v¨B«Ø¥ß¥xÆW¤½¤û¨tÃлP¿ò¶ÇÀË´ú¸ê®Æ®w¡AÀ³¥Îµ{¦¡¥HHTML°t¦XActive Server Pages (ASP)¤è¦¡¶}µo¡A¥HIE 5.0¬°¾Þ§@Àô¹Ò¡A°t¦X·L³n¤½¥qªºMicrosoft SQL Server 7.0¸ê®Æ®w³nÅé¡A¥HVB Script¬°¥D­n¶}µo»y¨¥¡A¨t²Î«h«Ø¸m©óPC SERVER¤W¡A§@·~¨t²Î¨Ï¥ÎMicrosoft NT 4.0ª©¥»¡Aºô»Úºô¸ôªA°ÈÀô¹Ò±Ä¥ÎMicrosoft Internet Information Server (IIS) 4.0ª©¥»¡A¤w«Ø¸mªº¶i¤f§N­áºë²G¨tÃлP¿ò¶ÇÀË´ú¬d¸ß¨t²Î(http://www.angrin.tlri.gov.tw/)¡A´£¨Ñ¹T¹A¤á¯à¦Ûºô»Úºô¸ô¥Ñ³æ¤@µøµ¡¥Hµn¿ý¸¹¡BNAAB½X¡Bºë²G½X»Pµu¦Wµ¥¶i¦æ¬d¸ß¤½¤û¨tÃлP¿ò¶ÇÀË´ú¸ê°T¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¸ê®Æ®w¡B¤½¤û¡B¥þ²y¸ê°Tºô¡C

¡@

DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNET-BASED GENETIC DATABASE FOR
TAIWAN BULLS AND IMPORTED FROZEN SEMEN

Y. C. Huang, S. J. Tsai, S. C. Lee, H. L. Chang, T. F. Shiao, C. L. Chang and M. C. Wu

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Based on imported semen database updated by TLRI, Hsinchu Branch Institute, since 1975, an internet bull genetic database was established. Genetic test data from TLRI AI bull station, and pedigree with genetic test data from Holstein associations of different countries were merged and cumulated. Microsoft IE5.0 was the default browser for developing the Active Server Pages (ASP)¡Aand PC based Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 was used for data table creation. With Microsoft NT 4.0 and VB Script under Microsoft Internet Information Server V4.0 environment, remote dairy farmers can choose registration number, NAAB code, semen code or short name to search pedigree and genetic test data.

Key words: Database, Bull, World Wide Web.



¥À½Þ³y°©³J¥Õ¥æ´À°ò¦]¹ï²£¥J©Ê¯à¤§¼vÅT



¥À½Þ³y°©³J¥Õ¥æ´À°ò¦]¹ï²£¥J©Ê¯à¤§¼vÅT

¹ù¤¯Ä_ ±i¨qÆq ¿à¥Ã¸Î ¼BÀA±ø §d©ú­õ

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¥H³y°©³J¥Õ°ò¦]¡]OPN¡^·L½Ã¬P«¬¿ò¶Ç¼Ð°OÀË´ú180ÀY¸g²£ºØ¥À½Þ±Ò°Ê¤l°Ï°ì¤§[TG]§Ç¦C­«½Æ¼Æ¥æ´À°ò¦]¡A¨ä¥æ´À°ò¦]Ãþ«¬¨Ì©Ò¨ã[TG]Âù®Öþ«»Ä­«½Æ¼Æ°Ï¤À¡A­pµo²{¤EºØ¥æ´À°ò¦]¡A28ºØ°ò¦]«¬¡C¦b¤£¦P«~ºØªº¤À¥¬¤À§O¬°¡G©ó51ÀYÂÅ·ç´µºØ¥À½Þ¤¤¡A¦³[TG]13¡B[TG]14¡B[TG]19©M [TG]21µ¥¥|ºØ¥æ´À°ò¦]¡A¦@²Õ¦¨¤EºØ°ò¦]«¬¡F©ó54ÀY¬ù§J®LºØ¥À½Þ¤¤¡A­p¦³[TG]8¡B[TG]14¡B[TG]21¡B[TG]23¡B[TG]24©M[TG]26µ¥¤»ºØ¥æ´À°ò¦]¡A¦@²Õ¦¨20ºØ°ò¦]«¬¡F©ó25ÀY§ù¬¥§J½ÞºØ¥À½Þ¤¤¡A­p¦³[TG]14¡B[TG]21¡B[TG]23©M[TG]24µ¥¥|ºØ¥æ´À°ò¦]¡A¦@²Õ¦¨¤»ºØ°ò¦]«¬¡F¦Ó©ó50½L§J®LºØºØ¥À½Þ¤¤¡A©Òµo²{ªº¤­ºØ¥æ´À°ò¦]¤À§O¬°[TG]8¡B[TG]13¡B[TG]23¡B[TG]24©M[TG]25¡A¦@²Õ¦¨¤KºØ°ò¦]«¬¡C¶i¤@¨B¤ÀªRºØ¥À½Þ¨ã¤£¦POPN¥æ´À°ò¦]¹ï²£¥J©Ê¯à¤§¼vÅT¡Aµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡G¨ã[TG]14¥æ´À°ò¦]¤§¬ù§J®LºØ¥À½Þ©Ò¤À®Y¬¡¥J¼ÆÅãµÛ¦a¸û¥¼¨ã¸Ó¥æ´À°ò¦]ªÌ¬°¨Î¡]8.41¡Ó0.74 vs.7.25¡Ó0.36ÀY¡AP¡Õ0.0257)¡F¨ã[TG]21©Î[TG]24¥æ´À°ò¦]¤§§ù¬¥§JºØ¥À½Þ©Ò¤À®Y¥J½Þ¤§¦s¬¡²v¥çÅãµÛ¦a¸û¥¼¨ã¸Ó¥æ´À°ò¦]ªÌ¬°¨Î¡]85.8¡Ó4.6 vs. 74.3¡Ó4.2%¡AP¡Õ0.0196¡F87.9¡Ó4.9 vs. 72.1¡Ó4.0%¡AP¡Õ0.0019)¡FµM¦Ó¨ã[TG]13¥æ´À°ò¦]¤§½L§J®LºØ¥À½Þ¡A¨ä©Ò¤À®Y¬¡¥J¼ÆÅãµÛ¦a¸û¥¼¨ã¸Ó¥æ´À°ò¦]ªÌ¬°®t¡]6.10¡Ó1.00 vs. 7.20¡Ó0.80ÀY¡AP¡Õ0.0495¡^¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G³y°©³J¥Õ¡B¥æ´À°ò¦]¡B²£¥J©Ê¯à¡C

¡@

INFLUENCE OF SOWS¡¦ OSTEOPONTIN ALLELES TO THEIR LITTER PERFORMANCE

R. B. Liaw, H. L. Chang, Y. Y. Lai, C. T. Liu and M. C. Wu

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

A total of 180 parous sows were genotyped with osteopontin (OPN) microsatellite marker by PCR. The OPN allele was defined as consisting of different number of [TG] dinucleotide repeats in the promoter region of OPN gene. In this study, nine alleles were found and making up 28 genotypes. There were different alleles distributed among four swine breeds. In 51 Landrace pigs, four alleles including [TG]13, [TG]14, [TG]19 and [TG]21 were found and making up nine genotypes. In 54 Yorkshire pigs, six alleles including [TG]8, [TG]14, [TG]21, [TG]23, [TG]24 and [TG]26 were found and making up 20 genotypes. In 25 Duroc pigs, four alleles including [TG]14, [TG]21, [TG]23 and [TG]24 were found and making up six genotypes. In 50 Berkshire pigs, five alleles including [TG]8, [TG]13, [TG]23, [TG]24 and [TG]25 were found and making up eight genotypes. When we further analyzed the litter performance of sows with different OPN alleles, the results indicated that the number of alive piglets born from Yorkshire sows with [TG]14 allele were significantly more than those without such an allele(8.41¡Ó0.74 vs.7.25¡Ó0.36, P¡Õ0.0257). For Duroc sows, the survival rate of piglet born from sows with [TG]21 or [TG]24 allele was significantly higher than those without [TG]21 or [TG]24 allele(85.8¡Ó4.6 vs. 74.3¡Ó4.2%, P¡Õ0.0196; 87.9¡Ó4.9 vs. 72.1¡Ó4.0%, P¡Õ0.0019). But for Berkshire sows, the number of alive piglets born from sows with [TG]13 allele were significantly less than those without [TG]13 allele(6.10¡Ó1.00 vs. 7.20¡Ó0.80, P¡Õ0.0495).

Key Words: Osteopontin, Allele, Litter performance.



½Þ²É¸¢ÅéDNA D-loop°Ï°ì¤§§Ç¦C¤ÀªR



½Þ²É¸¢ÅéDNA D-loop°Ï°ì¤§§Ç¦C¤ÀªR

ÃC©À·O(1) ¶À¤ì¬î(2)

(1)¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò (2)°ê¥ß¤¤¿³¤j¾Ç¯b²£¨t

ÂÅ·ç´µ¤Î±ö¤s½Þªº½Þ²É¸¢ÅéDNA D-loop°Ï°ì§Ç¦C¤w¸g³Q´£¥X¡A¨Ãµo²{ÂÅ·ç´µ¡B±ö¤s½Þ¤Î¤j¥Õ½Þ¤§¶¡¯S®íDNA D-loop°Ï°ì¦³®t²§¡A¦¹µ²ªGÅã¥Ü½Þ²É¸¢ÅéDNA D-loop°Ï°ìªºª[²§©Ê¨ã¦³¼ç¤O¨Ñ½Þ°¦²Ó­M½è¿ò¶Çªº¤ÀªR¥Î¡C¥»¸ÕÅç³]­p¤F¤@²Õ¥i¥H½Þ¤§°ò¦]²ÕDNA¬°¼ÒªO¡A¸g¥Ñ»E¦Xþª³sÂê¤ÏÀ³¡A¼W´Þ¥XD-loop°Ï°ì392 bp¤ù¬qªº¤Þ¤l¡A§Q¥Î¦¹²Õ¤Þ¤l¼W´Þ¥X¤£¦P«~ºØ½Þ°¦¤§D-loop°Ï°ì392 bp¤ù¬q¡A¶i¦æ§Ç¦C¤ÀªR¡Cµ²ªGµo²{¦¹¤ù¬q§Ç¦C¦@¦³16­Ó®Öþ«»Ä¦ì¸mµo¥ÍÅܲ§¡A¦Ó¦b³o16­ÓÅܲ§¤¤¦³13­ÓÅܲ§¬°¦PÃþ¸m´«¡C¶i¤@¨B­pºâ¤£¦P«~ºØ½Þ°¦¶¡¤§§Ç¦C¤Àª[«×¡Aµo²{¼Ú¬ü»P¨È¬w«~ºØ¤º½Þ°¦ªº§Ç¦C¤Àª[«×¤À§O¬°0.63 ¡Ó 0.59 %»P0.51 ¡Ó 0.27 %¡A¦Ó¼Ú¬ü»P¨È¬w«~ºØ½Þ°¦¤§¶¡ªº§Ç¦C¤Àª[«×¸û¬°1.31 ¡Ó 0.59 %¡C¦¹µ²ªG¥i¨Ñ½Þ°¦²Ó­M½è¿ò¶Çºt¤Æ¤§°Ñ¦Ò¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G½Þ¡B²É¸¢ÅéDNA¡B§Ç¦C¤ÀªR¡C

¡@

SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF D-LOOP REGION IN THE
MITOCHONDRIAL DNA OF PIGS

N. T. Yen(1,2) and M. C. Huang(1)

(1)National Chung-Hsing University (2)Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

The entire mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) displacement loops (D-loops) of Landrace and Meishan have been sequenced, and the divergences of specific D-loop region among Landrace, Large White, and Meishan have been compared. The results hinted that D-loop polymorphism and/or sequence diversity is potential for molecular analysis of cytoplasmic genetic in pigs. A pair of primer was designed for the amplification by PCR to generate a 392 bp fragment of the D-loop region from the template DNA of pure pig breeds. These 392 bp PCR products were verified by their sequences. The results showed that there were 16 site substitutions in the 392 bp fragment of D-loop region. Thirteen nucleotide variations were transition. The average sequence diversities of D-loop region of the European-American and Asian breed pigs were 0.63¡Ó0.59% and 0.51¡Ó0.27%, respectively. The average sequence diversity of D-loop region between the European-American breed and Asian breed pigs was 1.31¡Ó0.59%. It showed that the sequence diversity of D-loop region is useful for evolution analysis of cytoplasmic genetic in pigs.

Key Words : Pig, mtDNA, Sequencing.



¯b¸Õ¤gÂûªñ¿Ë«~¨t»P¯Q°©ÂûÂø¥æ¤@¥N¥Íªø©Êª¬



¯b¸Õ¤gÂûªñ¿Ë«~¨t»P¯Q°©ÂûÂø¥æ¤@¥N¥Íªø©Êª¬

Áé¨qªK ±i¨qÆq §d©ú­õ ¶À²»¦N

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¥xÆW¤gÂû¬°¤@µÛ¦Wªº¦a¤èÂûºØ¡A¦Ó¯Q°©Âû«h¬°¤¤°êµÛ¦Wªº¦a¤èÂûºØ¤§¤@¡A¨ä¥HÃĥλPÆ[½à¥Î»D¦W¡C¥»¸ÕÅ礧¥Øªº¬°±´°Q·½¦Û¥xÆW¤gÂû¤§¯b¸Õ¤gÂûªñ¿Ë«~¨t»P¯Q°©ÂûÂø¥æ¤@¥N¤§¥Íªø©Êª¬¡C§Q¥Î¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò¨|¦¨¤§¯b¸Õ¤gÂûªñ¿Ë«~¨t(C)¤½Âû5°¦¡A¤j³°¤Þ¶i¤§¶Â¦Ð(B)»P¤Îµ·¦Ð(W)¯Q°©¥ÀÂû¦U11»P10°¦¬°¸ÕÅç°Êª«¡CÀ³¥Î¤H¤u±Âºë¤è¦¡¶i¦æÂø¥æ¸ÕÅç¡A½Õ¬dÂø¥æ«á¸ÇF1¤§¥Íªø©Êª¬»P¸}×Hªø«×¡C­p¦¬¶°ªñ¿Ë«~¨t¤gÂû»P¶Â¦Ð¯Q°©ÂûÂø¥æ²Õ(CB)ºØ³J126­Ó¡A¨üºë²v89.7%¡A¹å¤Æ²v87.6%¡Fªñ¿Ë«~¨t¤gÂû»Pµ·¦Ð¯Q°©Âû(CW)Âø¥æ²ÕºØ³J101­Ó¡A¨üºë²v80.2%¡A¹å¤Æ²v82.7%¡CÂø¥æ«á¸ÇF1¥Íªø©Êª¬µ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡GCBÂû°¦¹F18¶gÄÖ¤§¤½»P¥ÀÂû¥­§¡Åé­«¤À§O¬°1574.7¡Ó33.4 (N=43)»P1158.5¡Ó34.0 (N=42)¤½§J¡F¸}×Hªø«×¤À§O¬°11.66¡Ó0.08»P9.68¡Ó0.08¤½¤À¡CCW²Õ¤§¬Û¹ïÀ³©Êª¬«h¤À§O¬°¤½»P¥ÀÂû¥­§¡Åé­«1458.9¡Ó49.0 (N=20) »P1113.0¡Ó39.2 (N=31)¤½§J¡F¸}×Hªø«×11.20¡Ó0.11»P9.60¡Ó0.09¤½¤À¡C¦¹¥~¡ACB²ÕÂû°¦¤§18¶gÄÖÅé­«»P¸}×Hªø«×§¡ÅãµÛ¦a¸ûCWªÌ¬°¤j(1366.6¡Ó23.8 vs. 1285.9¡Ó31.4¤½§J¡F10.67¡Ó0.06 vs. 10.40¡Ó0.07¤½¤À)¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¥xÆW¤gÂû¡B¯Q°©Âû¡B¥Íªø©Êª¬¡B¸}×Hªø«×¡C

¡@

GROWTH TRAITS OF (TAIWAN NATIVE CHICKEN INBRED
LINES X SILKIER CHICKEN)

H. C. Chung, H. L. Chang, M. C. Wu and H. C. Huang

Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

Taiwan native chicken and Silkier chicken are famous local chicken in Taiwan and Mainland China, respectively. The latter is also famous for it medical usage and known as one of the fancy breeds. The objective of this study was to asses the growth traits of F1, Taiwan native chicken TLRI inbred lines X Silkier chicken. Samples of 5 cocks of Taiwan native chicken TLRI inbred line (C), 11 and 10 hens of black (B) and white (W) Silkier chicken, respectively, were used as sire and dam to produce F1 hybrid progeny via artificial insemination. A total of 126 fertilized eggs from B hens sired by C cocks (CB) were collected and hatched with fertilization rate and hatchability being 89.7% and 87.6%, respectively. The corresponding fertilization rate and hatchability were 80.2% and 82.7% for 101 fertilized eggs from W hens sired by C cocks (CW) contemporaneously. Body weights at 18 weeks of age for male and female in CB hybrid were 1574.7¡Ó33.4 (N=43) and 1158.5¡Ó34.0 (N=42) gm with 11.66¡Ó0.08 and 9.68¡Ó0.08 cm in shank length, respectively. There were (1458.9¡Ó49.0 gm and 11.20¡Ó0.11 cm, N=20) and (1113.0¡Ó39.2 gm and 9.60¡Ó0.09 cm, N=31) for the male and female birds of CW in corresponding traits. Furthermore, Both weight and shank length at 18 weeks of age in CB hybrids were significantly larger than those in CW hybrids (1366.6¡Ó23.8 vs. 1285.9¡Ó31.4 gm, P<0.05¡F10.67¡Ó0.06 vs. 10.40¡Ó0.07cm, P<0.01).

Key Words: Taiwan native chicken, Silkier chicken, Growth traits, Shank length.



¥xÆWÂÅ·ç´µ¡B¬ù§J®L»P§ù¬¥§Jµn¿ý½Þ¬¡¥J¼Æ¤§¨|ºØ»ù¹w´ú



¥xÆWÂÅ·ç´µ¡B¬ù§J®L»P§ù¬¥§Jµn¿ý½Þ¬¡¥J¼Æ¤§¨|ºØ»ù¹w´ú

§õ¥@©÷(1) ±i¨qÆq(1) §d©ú­õ(1) ¶Àà±¹Å(1) ¿à¥Ã¸Î(1) ¤ý¦°©÷(2) §º¥Ã¸q(3)

(1)¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò (2)°]¹Îªk¤H¤¤¥¡¯b²£·| (3)°ê¥ß¥xÆW¤j¾Ç¯b²£¨t

À³¥ÎºØ½Þµn¿ý¸ê®Æ®w¤§ºØ¥À½Þ¤À®Y¸ê®Æ(¦Û1989¦~4¤ë¦Ü2000¦~1¤ë¶¡¤À®YªÌ)¡A­p¥]¬A33,931ÀYµn¿ý¥À½Þ¤§112,000­L¤À®Y°O¿ý¡F¨ä¤¤ÂÅ·ç´µ¡B¬ù§J®L»P§ù¬¥§JÀY¼Æ¤À§O¬°17,127¡B6,287»P10,517ÀY¡A¬Û¹ïÀ³¤§¤À®Y­L¼Æ¬°56,687¡B20,947»P34,366­L¡CÁc´Þ©Êª¬¤§¿ò¶Çµû¦ô¼Ò¦¡«Y°w¹ïµn¿ý½Þ¤§¬¡¥J¼Æ²£¥J¯à¤O¬°Æ[´ú­È¡A¦Ó¥H«~ºØ¡B¥X¥Í¦~§O»P©u¸`¡B¤À®Y¸Ó­L¤§¦~§O»P©u¸`¡B¥H¤Î¤À®Y¸Ó­L¤§²£¦¸¬°©T©w®ÄÀ³¡A¥À½Þ¤À®Y¸Ó­L¤§¤éÄÖ»P¤éÄÖ¥­¤è¬°¦@ÅܼơA¥À½Þ¤§²Ö¥[©Ê¿ò¶Ç®ÄÀ³»P´Ý®tµ¥¬°³{¾÷®ÄÀ³¡F¨ä¤¤©u¸`¤À¬°¼ö(¨C¦~5¦Ü10¤ë)»P²D(¨C¦~11¦Ü¹j¦~4¤ë)©u¡A²£¦¸«h¤À¬°ªì²£»P¸g²£¡CÀ³¥Î«e­z°Êª«²V¦X¼Ò¦¡©Ò±o¤§²Ö¥[©Ê¿ò¶Ç®ÄÀ³»P´Ý®t¤§­­¨î·¥¤j¦üµM¦ô­È(REML)´«ºâ¤§¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§²v¦ô­È¬°0.237¡AÀH«áÀ³¥Î©ó«e­z¿ò¶Çµû¦ô¼Ò¦¡¶i¦æ©T©w®ÄÀ³¤§³Ì¨Î½u©ÊµL°¾¦ô­p(BLUE)ÀË©w»Pµn¿ýºØ½Þ²£¬¡¥J¼Æ¤§¿ò¶Ç­È³Ì¨Î½u©ÊµL°¾¹w´ú(BLUP)¡C¤À®Y®É¡A¸g²£¥À½ÞÅãµÛ¦a¸ûªì²£ªÌ¦h0.79¡Ó0.02ÀY¬¡¥J¼Æ(P<0.001)¡F¥X¥Í©ó²D©u¤§¥À½Þ©ó¤À®Y®ÉÅãµÛ¦a¸û¼ö©u¥X¥ÍªÌ¦h²£0.05¡Ó0.02ÀY¬¡¥J½Þ(P<0.01)¡F¤À®Y©u¸`®ÄÀ³¥ç¦³¬Û¦PªºÁͶÕ(0.10¡Ó0.01ÀY¡AP<0.001)¡C¦¹¥~¡Aµn¿ýºØ½Þ²£¬¡¥J¼Æ¤§¿ò¶Ç­È³Ì¨Î½u©ÊµL°¾¹w´ú(BLUP)»P¤­¤Q¤j±Æ¦æº]¡A¥H¤Î«e­z¤T«~ºØ¤§¤G¤Q¤j±Æ¦æº]¡A§¡¤w©óºô»Úºô¸ô¬d¸ß¨t²Î(http://www.angrin.tlri.gov.tw/)¤¤¡A¨Ñ·~ªÌ¿ïºØ¥Î¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¨|ºØ»ù¡B³Ì¨Î½u©ÊµL°¾¹w´ú¡Bµn¿ý½Þ¡C

¡@

PREDICTION OF BREEDING VALUES FOR REGISTERED STOCKS IN
TAIWAN LANDRACE, YORKSHIRE AND DUROC PIGS

S. C. Lee(1), H. L. Chang(1), M. C. Wu(1), Y. C. Huang(1), Y. Y. Lai(1), H. C. Wang(2) and Y. Y. Sung(3)

(1)Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture
(2)National Animal Industry Foundation (3)National Taiwan University

There were 112,000 litters produced during April 1989 and January 2000 from 33,931 registered sows in Taiwan Swine Herdbook used in the study, including 56,687, 20,947 and 34,366 litters from 17,127 Landrace, 6,287 Yorkshire and 10,517 Duroc sows, respectively. Litter size born alive was the reproductive trait considered. Genetic evaluation model included breed, season and year of sow at birth, season and year as well as parity of sow at farrowing as fixed effects, age in days at farrowing and its quadratic as covariates, additive genetic effects and error as random effects. There were two classes in sows' birth and farrowing seasons, hot and cool seasons. The former was defined as from April to October and the latter was for the rest months of the year. Parity of sows at farrowing was also classified as two levels, first parity and parous sows. Estimates of heritability from additive genetic variances via REML for the trait evaluated was 0.237, which was then implemented in the animal mixed linear model to estimate and test the corresponding fixed effects (BLUE) and to predict the random additive genetic values of animals (BLUP). Parous sows produced 0.79¡Ó0.02 piglets more than those of first parity sows (P<0.001). Also, sows born and littering at cool season had 0.05¡Ó0.02 (P<0.01) and 0.10¡Ó0.01 (P<0.001) piglets more than those of born and littering at hot season ones, respectively. Furthermore, BLUP of additive genetic values and top 50 across breeds ranking for registered stocks as well as top 20 within breed ranking for the trait evaluated were listed in the search system with URL (http://www.angrin.tlri.gov.tw/) available for selection purpose.

Key Words: Breeding value, BLUP, Registered pigs.
¥xÆW¯b²£ºØ­ìª¾ÃÑ®w - https://agrkb.angrin.tlri.gov.tw