¦æ¨Æ¾ä
¤W­Ó¤ë2025¦~ 7¤ë¤U­Ó¤ë
¤é ¤@ ¤G ¤T ¥| ¤­ ¤»
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
¤µ¤Ñ
 ¥D¿ï³æ
 ¥Xª©¥Zª«
 ³X°Ý²Î­p

 ÀH¾÷¤å³¹
ÂÅ·ç´µ¥À½Þ¦X·Ó(­^¤å) (1579)
§ù¬¥§J§¹ÀË(¤¤¤å) (1393)
¬ù§J®L§¹ÀË(¤¤¤å) (1445)
ÂÅ·ç´µ±Äºë·Ó¤ù (1212)
ÂÅ·ç´µ±Äºë·Ó¤ù (1055)
 ¼öªù³sµ²ºô¯¸


¤À­¶¥Ø¿ý
1. ¨Å¤ûªì²£¤ëÄÖ´£¦­«á¤§¨Å¶q¨Å½è¬ã¨s
2. ­@¼ö«¬¨Å¤û¤§Ác´Þ°ò¦]«¬¤Î¨ä¨Å¶q¨Å½è©Êª¬ªí²{
3. ¯ÂºØ½Þ«~¨t¿ï¨|¤Î«~¨tÂø¥æ¤§°ò¦]¼Ð°O¬ã¨s
4. ¥Á¶¡¦Ï³õ¤s¦ÏÂH¦hÁÞ¯g°ò¦]ÀW率»P°ò¦]¦h¼Ë©Ê¤ÀªR
5. ·L½Ã¬P¿ò¶Ç¼Ð°O¤ÀªR¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò¥Õ¦âµ·¦Ð¯Q°©Âûªº¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§
6. ¶Â¦âµ·¦Ð¯Q°©Âû¤§·L½Ã¬P¿ò¶Ç¼Ð°O¤ÀªR
7. ¥Ìªo§Ü­á¾¯¹ï¤gÂû§N­áºë²G©Ê¯à¤§¼vÅT
8. ¦~»´ºØ¤½½Þºë²G«~½è¤§µû¦ô
9. ¥xÆW§ù¬¥§J¤½½Þ»P°tÂÅ·ç´µ¥À½ÞÁc´Þ©Ê¯à¤§¬ã¨s
10. ½Õ¬d¥xÆW¶Â½Þ³õºØ½Þ¤§ºò­¢»P¦h²£°ò¦]ÀW²v
11. ¥xÆW§ù¬¥§J½Þ»P¨äÂø¥æ¦×½Þ±OÅé©Êª¬µû¦ô
12. ®Ö¤ß½Þ¸s²£¥JÀY¼Æ¤Î¨ä¥J½Þ¤T¶gÄÖÅé­«¤§«~ºØ¤ñ¸û
²Ä¥|¤Q¤@¨÷(2012)
·L½Ã¬P¿ò¶Ç¼Ð°O¤ÀªR¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò¥Õ¦âµ·¦Ð¯Q°©Âûªº¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§

ªL¼w¨| ¼B¾åÀs ªL¸qºÖ ¿à¥Ã¸Î ¬x­õ©ú ¾G¸Î«H §d©ú­õ

¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò

¬°µû¦ô¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò¥Õ¦âµ·¦Ð¯Q°©Âû²£³J¼Æ¿ï¨|±Ú¸sªº¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§¡C§Q¥ÎFAO(2004)«ØÄ³¨Ï¥Îªº23²ÕÂû·L½Ã¬P¼Ð°O²Õ¤ÀªR87°¦¥Õ¦âµ·¦Ð¯Q°©ÂûºØÂû­ÓÅéDNA¡C¨ä¤¤°£MCW0098¡BMCW0183¤ÎMCW0216¤T²Õ·L½Ã¬P¼Ð°O©ÒÀË´úªº°ò¦]«¬¦b©Ò¦³ÀË´ú­ÓÅé¬Ò¬°³æ«¬¥~¡A¨ä¥¦20²Õ·L½Ã¬P¼Ð°O¬Ò¦³¦hºA«¬ªº°ò¦]«¬¡C¦@ÀË´ú¨ì72­Óalleles¡A¥­§¡¨C­Ó°ò¦]®y¨ã¦³3.1­Ó¹ï°¸°ò¦](1~7­Óalleles)¡F´Á±æ²§½è«×¤¶©ó0¨ì0.819¡A¥­§¡¬°0.398¡FÆ[´ú²§½è«×¤¶©ó0¨ì0.828¡A¥­§¡¬°0.372¡F¦hºA©Ê°T®§§t¶q¥­§¡¬°0.347¡C¦b¥»¸ÕÅç¿ï¥Îªº23²Õ·L½Ã¬P¼Ð°O²Õ¤¤¦³7²Õ§e²{°ª«×¦hºA©Ê¸ê°T(PIC≥0.5)¡C8²Õ§e²{¤¤«×¦hºA©Ê¸ê°T(0.5>PIC≥0.25)¡A8²Õ§e²{§C«×¦hºA©Ê¸ê°T(PIC<0.25)¡C¥»¸ÕÅçµ²ªG´£¨Ñ¦¹¥Õ¦âµ·¦Ð¯Q°©Âû¿ï¨|±Ú¸s¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§¤§°ò¥»¤À¤l¸ê°T¡C

ÃöÁä»y¡G¥Õ¦âµ·¦Ð¯Q°©Âû¡B¿ò¶ÇÅܲ§¡B·L衞¬P¼Ð°O


GENETIC VARIATION ANALYSIS OF LRI-COA WHITE SILKIE CHICKEN BY MICROSATELLITE MARKERS

D.Y. Lin, S.L. Liu, Y. F. Lin, Y.Y. Lai, C.M. Hung, Y.S. Cheng and M.C. Wu

Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture

In order to evaluate genetic variation of white silkie chicken selection flock in Livestock Research Institute-Council of Agriculture(LRI-COA), Executive Yuan. A set of 23 microsatellite markers recommended for chicken in FAO¡¦s DADIS MoDAD programme were utilized. The study was carried out on 87 birds from breeding flock to generate genotype data. Except 3 microsatellite markers, MCW0098¡BMCW0183 and MCW0216, all of the other microsatellites were polymorphic with average allelic number 3.1, ranged from 1 to 7 per locus. There were 72 alleles detected in total. The expected heterozygosity ranged from 0 to 0.819, and the average expected heterozygosity was 0.398. The observed heterozygosity of the population ranged from 0 to 0.828, and the average observed heterozygosity was 0.372. The estimated polymorphic information content (PIC) was 0347. In 23 markers, seven markers were highly informative with polymorphism information content (PIC ≥0. 50), eight markers were reasonably informative(0.5> PIC≥ 0.25) and the other eight markers were slightly informative (PIC < 0.25). These results could be provided basic molecular information for the research on the germplasm characteristics of white silkie chickens in LRI-COA.

Key Words: White silkie chicken, Genetic variation, Microsatellite marker



¤Íµ½¦C¦LÂà±H¦n¤Í ¿é¥X¬° PDF ®æ¦¡

  << List | Home | Top >> ²Ä¥|¤Q¤@¨÷(2012) © Copyright 2025 shuYing & ¥xÆW¯b²£ºØ­ìª¾ÃÑ®w
 ©ÒÀ²


 ·j´M

¶i¶¥·j´M

 ¹q¤l¬Ûï
ùÚ¬KºØ¦ÏST01000510·Ó¤ù

 ÀH¾÷¦n®Ñ

 ¹Ù¦ñºô¯¸

http://www.angrin.tlri.gov.tw

http://www.naif.org.tw/

http://www.coa.gov.tw

http://www.tlrihc.gov.tw/

http://minipigs.angrin.tlri.gov.tw


 ÀH¾÷¤p»y
¤£Åý®£Äߥª¥k¦Û¤v

[³Ç§J»¹¥¬®Ô]